DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51218] FOP is unable to create PDF if there is an unusually large paragraph.

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #11 from Luis Bernardo 2012-04-24 08:40:44 UTC --- this is an outofmemory issue so what does not work in one machine may work in some other. you only see the issue if your machine runs out of memory in which case you see the us

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51218] FOP is unable to create PDF if there is an unusually large paragraph.

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 --- Comment #12 from Luis Bernardo 2012-04-24 08:45:26 UTC --- Created attachment 28665 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28665 example repeat the content inside the block (it is long enough to not trigger a simpl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51218] FOP is unable to create PDF if there is an unusually large paragraph.

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51218 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: [VOTE] Switch from Bugzilla to JIRA

2012-04-24 Thread Vincent Hennebert
I find that Bugzilla Just Works and is easy to use. I don’t really see the need to change as long as it’s available. What support do we need from infra anyway? But as long as I don’t have anything to do... +0 Vincent On 17/04/12 09:15, Chris Bowditch wrote: > Hi All, > > We need to have a form

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52977] [PATCH] Unit tests for property classes

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #5 from Vincen

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 52977] [PATCH] Unit tests for property classes

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52977 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P5 Severity|normal

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50852] [PATCH] Improve generation of PDFs with accessibility information

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50852 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW --- Comment #32 from Vince

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51101] keep-with-next at end of document is wrongly taken into account on earlier content

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51101 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Hennebert 2012-04-24 14:58:08 UTC --- Created attachment 28668 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28668 Resulting PDF output -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/use

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51101] keep-with-next at end of document is wrongly taken into account on earlier content

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51101 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- Configure bugmail: htt

Re: svn commit: r1328963 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/expr/

2012-04-24 Thread Vincent Hennebert
On 22/04/12 21:09, gad...@apache.org wrote: > Author: gadams > Date: Sun Apr 22 20:09:42 2012 > New Revision: 1328963 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328963&view=rev > Log: > Snapshot commit - does not build! What does that mean? Could you briefly describe the purpose of this commit?

Re: svn commit: r1328580 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/truetype/TTFFile.java

2012-04-24 Thread Vincent Hennebert
On 21/04/12 05:11, gad...@apache.org wrote: > Author: gadams > Date: Sat Apr 21 04:11:44 2012 > New Revision: 1328580 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328580&view=rev > Log: > Tweak comment. Why not just remove the code? It’s versioned anyway. Very soon that piece of code will stop comp

Re: svn commit: r1328580 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fonts/truetype/TTFFile.java

2012-04-24 Thread Glenn Adams
I like to give a little time to remove such code in case someone wishes to dispute/revert my commented removal. If I don't remove in a reasonable time, then feel free to remind me. Thanks, G. On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:15 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > On 21/04/12 05:11, gad...@apache.org wrote:

Re: svn commit: r1328963 - /xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/fo/expr/

2012-04-24 Thread Glenn Adams
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Vincent Hennebert wrote: > On 22/04/12 21:09, gad...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: gadams > > Date: Sun Apr 22 20:09:42 2012 > > New Revision: 1328963 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1328963&view=rev > > Log: > > Snapshot commit - does not build! > >

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 50196] Padding-left ignored inside repeated table header

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50196 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

Re: Chinese PDFs and non embedded fonts

2012-04-24 Thread Glenn Adams
ok, on digging into this further i have found: (1) luis is correct that embedding is performed by default without the referenced-fonts element; (2) in particular, when i add i see the same behavior: glyphs not found; when i remove, it works fine (and embeds subset); (3) looking at TTFFontLoader

Re: Chinese PDFs and non embedded fonts

2012-04-24 Thread Glenn Adams
btw, this code has been present since 2008-05-08 [1] [1] http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=654461 On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > ok, on digging into this further i have found: > > (1) luis is correct that embedding is performed by default without the > r

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] New: non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 Bug #: 53142 Summary: non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte Product: Fop Version: 1.1dev Platform: All

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 --- Comment #1 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-24 19:49:07 UTC --- Created attachment 28670 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28670 FOP configuration file simsun.ttf should be downloaded and placed into a ./fonts director

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 --- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-24 19:49:45 UTC --- Created attachment 28671 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28671 console log -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=e

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 --- Comment #3 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-24 19:50:45 UTC --- Created attachment 28672 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28672 output PDF file output when configured for referencing (non-embedding) -- Configure bug

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P2 |P3 -- Configure bugmail: https://is

Re: Chinese PDFs and non embedded fonts

2012-04-24 Thread Glenn Adams
bug filed at https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 jean-philippe, you may want to create a bugzilla account and add yourself to the CC list for this bug On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: > ok, on digging into this further i have found: > > (1) luis is correc

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53142] non-embedded fonts are incorrectly assumed to be single byte, even when they are multi byte

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53142 ju...@apache.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ju...@apache.org -- Configure b

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53143] New: fonts loaded twice (redundantly)

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 Bug #: 53143 Summary: fonts loaded twice (redundantly) Product: Fop Version: 1.1dev Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: normal Pr

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 53143] fonts loaded twice (redundantly)

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53143 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51076] Underline and Highlight do not have the correct spacing when PCL is generated for non monospaced fonts

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076 --- Comment #4 from Divakar P 2012-04-25 06:46:41 UTC --- Created attachment 28673 --> https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28673 PCL, FO for Space issue Please find the attached FO and corresponding PCL, RTF and PDF do

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 51076] Underline and Highlight do not have the correct spacing when PCL is generated for non monospaced fonts

2012-04-24 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51076 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|NEW -- Configure bugmail: https://i