[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15357302#comment-15357302 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi FOP Users, I am working on a project that

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15357932#comment-15357932 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Glenn, Thanks for replying. Let me ask a co

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1747) FOP should provide SVG DTD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15391844#comment-15391844 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1747: -- Hi Glenn, I had an issue with SVG and DTD and

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1747) FOP should provide SVG DTD

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1747?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15394102#comment-15394102 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1747: -- Hi Glenn, I found out the the real root of the

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15394370#comment-15394370 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Glenn, I got a first proof of concept that

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15394669#comment-15394669 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I think it's exactly the same issue, and probab

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15394703#comment-15394703 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I meant the same as FOP-2094. > Surrogate pai

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2638) FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application

Simone Rondelli created FOP-2638: Summary: FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application Key: FOP-2638 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2638 Project: FOP Issue Type: Bug

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15395899#comment-15395899 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Created: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2638) FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Rondelli updated FOP-2638: - Description: In {{GlyphMapping.processWordMapping}} the script of the text is retrieved using {{Str

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2638) FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Rondelli updated FOP-2638: - Description: In {{GlyphMapping.processWordMapping}} the script of the text is retrieved using {{Str

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-2638) FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397270#comment-15397270 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-2638 at 7/28/16 8:48 AM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2638) FOText.getScript() may prevent gsub/gpos application

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2638?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397270#comment-15397270 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2638: -- Currently ApacheFOP do not support non-BMP char

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397694#comment-15397694 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Would it be a problem if I change the variable

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397694#comment-15397694 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 7/28/16 3:37 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15397760#comment-15397760 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Ok, get it. One more thing: I found that Contr

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15398299#comment-15398299 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I see what you mean. So maybe there is a bug in

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15398299#comment-15398299 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 7/28/16 10:11 PM: --

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

Simone Rondelli created FOP-2644: Summary: Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables Key: FOP-2644 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644 Project: FOP Issue

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455708#comment-15455708 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2644: -- As a solution I just suggest to include the GS

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Rondelli updated FOP-2644: - Description: In order to reduce the memory footprint of an ApacheFOP based application, where I hav

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455770#comment-15455770 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2644: -- A question unrelated to this issue: Why every r

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455902#comment-15455902 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2644: -- Thanks Adam for clarification. The reason why I

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-2644) Generated font metrics do not contains GSUB, GPOS, GDEF tables

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2644?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15455902#comment-15455902 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-2644 at 9/1/16 4:22 PM: --

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506134#comment-15506134 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Simon, Thanks for taking a look to this. Co

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506786#comment-15506786 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I see the problem. {code:java|title=MultiByteF

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15506786#comment-15506786 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/20/16 2:53 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15507202#comment-15507202 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- GlyphSequence is already using an IntBuffer to

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15508787#comment-15508787 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I see, let's keep it like this for now. But wha

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15509425#comment-15509425 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I think that I get were is the case. In the lig

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15510430#comment-15510430 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi SImon, I have updated the pull request: -

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15510430#comment-15510430 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/21/16 5:20 PM: ---

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15510720#comment-15510720 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- It looks like Findbugs 3.0.4 works fine with Ja

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513272#comment-15513272 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Yep! You can check the renderings here https:/

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513298#comment-15513298 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Do you mean that the text is messed up or do yo

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513308#comment-15513308 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I cannot reproduce it, could you please share y

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513352#comment-15513352 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Done, i run checkstyle with ant and fixed all t

[jira] [Comment Edited] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513352#comment-15513352 ] Simone Rondelli edited comment on FOP-1969 at 9/22/16 1:57 PM: ---

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (FOP-2525) [PATCH] Memory leak present when using Truetype Collection (.ttc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Rondelli updated FOP-2525: - Comment: was deleted (was: As for the subclasses they are: GlyphPositioningTable (org.apache.fop.co

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2525) [PATCH] Memory leak present when using Truetype Collection (.ttc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513393#comment-15513393 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2525: -- As for the subclasses they are: GlyphPositioni

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2525) [PATCH] Memory leak present when using Truetype Collection (.ttc)

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2525?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513394#comment-15513394 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2525: -- As for the subclasses they are: GlyphPositioni

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15513410#comment-15513410 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Can reproduce it, now I'm working on it. As for

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15516654#comment-15516654 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Updated Pull Request. Now It handle correctly s

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15516734#comment-15516734 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Updated. > Surrogate pairs not treated as sing

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15516792#comment-15516792 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Updated again. > Surrogate pairs not treated a

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15523208#comment-15523208 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- updated again with a fix in Java2DRenderer > S

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2649) Implement an extensible way to select fonts

Simone Rondelli created FOP-2649: Summary: Implement an extensible way to select fonts Key: FOP-2649 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2649 Project: FOP Issue Type: Improvement

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2650) Cache CustomFont instances

Simone Rondelli created FOP-2650: Summary: Cache CustomFont instances Key: FOP-2650 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2650 Project: FOP Issue Type: Improvement Compone

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2649) Implement an extensible way to select fonts

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2649?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15526551#comment-15526551 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2649: -- Thanks Glenn for the quick response, I'll try t

[jira] [Created] (FOP-2651) Creation of CustomFontMetricsMapper using File instead InputStream

Simone Rondelli created FOP-2651: Summary: Creation of CustomFontMetricsMapper using File instead InputStream Key: FOP-2651 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2651 Project: FOP I

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2650) Cache CustomFont instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15526590#comment-15526590 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2650: -- Indeed that is my usecase. I have currently an

[jira] [Updated] (FOP-2650) Cache CustomFont instances

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Simone Rondelli updated FOP-2650: - Description: Custom fonts are loaded through the {{FontLoader}} class on every rendering (for every

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15530106#comment-15530106 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- I don;t have the rights to create/edit pages. C

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15533249#comment-15533249 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Since I cannot modify the Wiki I have updated t

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15536304#comment-15536304 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Wiki page created: https://wiki.apache.org/xmlg

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602625#comment-15602625 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- The project is already using org.apache.pdfbox:

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15602758#comment-15602758 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Ok, now I see it. Updated the pull request to u

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15608603#comment-15608603 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Simon/Glenn, As Glenn mentioned in an offli

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15628909#comment-15628909 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Any update on this issue? > Surrogate pairs n

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15647791#comment-15647791 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hello Any update on when somebody will review t

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2670) Unicode character (left arrow) is not displayed in PDF.It displayed as #

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15697626#comment-15697626 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2670: -- Hi Sankaranarayanan, Could you please share a

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2670) Unicode character (left arrow) is not displayed in PDF.It displayed as #

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15697761#comment-15697761 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2670: -- What happens if you use as input: Aa Usin

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-2670) Unicode character (left arrow) is not displayed in PDF.It displayed as #

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2670?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15701328#comment-15701328 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-2670: -- Could you provide the XSL, fop.xml, data.xml an

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15930271#comment-15930271 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hey Simon, will this patch ever be incorporated

[jira] [Commented] (FOP-1969) Surrogate pairs not treated as single unicode codepoint for display purposes

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-1969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16392009#comment-16392009 ] Simone Rondelli commented on FOP-1969: -- Hi Kelly, Thanks for bringing this up :) It w