sion=1437102
> missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives
>
>
> Key: FOP-2197
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2197
> Project: Fop
> Issue Type:
Glenn Adams created FOP-2197:
Summary: missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives
Key: FOP-2197
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2197
Project: Fop
Issue Type: Bug
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #2 from Glenn Ada
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886
Pascal Sancho changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886
Summary: Links to Nabble archives are broken
Product: Fop
Version: all
Platform: PC
OS/Version: Windows XP
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Eyebrowse is discontinued. There's an effort under way to establish
a map of Eyebrowse links to the mod_mbox archives. And they want to add
full text search using Lucene to mod_mbox. No idea when that is going to
happen though. :-(
On 25.04.2005 16:44:51 Glen Mazza wrote:
> Did you also
know if someone else has done so earlier
> (I
> > recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back),
> but
> > I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1]
> asking
> > them to switch their FOP lists to our new
> @xmlgraphics
> > addresses. I hope they wil
switch their FOP lists to our new @xmlgraphics
> addresses. I hope they will do so--our present
> archives lists aren't very good--there's no searching
> capability, etc.
>
> Glen
>
> [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
>
Jeremias Maerki
I don't know if someone else has done so earlier (I
recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back), but
I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1] asking
them to switch their FOP lists to our new @xmlgraphics
addresses. I hope they will do so--our present
archives lists aren't
xmlgraphics.apache.org/
> (looks like there is no link on the FOP website yet...)
Ah, didn't remember that one. Too bad, the archives are now split
between the old and the new name there.
Jeremias Maerki
Chris Bowditch schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Oh ... I see. Well thanks for looking into the MARC problem. Doesnt
anyone @infrastructure have a contact there we can speak to directly?
I don't think so.
Last time I contacted them directly via mail and they did set up the
fop-user archive within ho
n.
On 30.03.2005 12:08:55 Chris Bowditch wrote:
I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until 12th
March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do
to ensure all future posts are saved in the Archives?
The links on the website to eyebrowse
ished with the whole machine
migration and reorganization.
On 30.03.2005 12:08:55 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until
> 12th
> March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do
> to ensure all
I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until 12th
March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do
to ensure all future posts are saved in the Archives?
The links on the website to eyebrowse also appear to be broken.
Chris
14 matches
Mail list logo
