[jira] [Resolved] (FOP-2197) missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2197?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Glenn Adams resolved FOP-2197. -- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: trunk http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1437102 > missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives > > > Key: FOP-2197 > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2197 > Project: Fop > Issue Type: Bug > Components: general >Affects Versions: trunk >Reporter: Glenn Adams >Assignee: Glenn Adams > Fix For: trunk > > -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Created] (FOP-2197) missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives
Glenn Adams created FOP-2197: Summary: missing GlyphTester class in transcoder archives Key: FOP-2197 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FOP-2197 Project: Fop Issue Type: Bug Components: general Affects Versions: trunk Reporter: Glenn Adams Assignee: Glenn Adams -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48886] Links to Nabble archives are broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #2 from Glenn Adams 2012-04-01 13:50:42 UTC --- batch transition to closed remaining pre-FOP1.0 resolved bugs -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48886] Links to Nabble archives are broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886 Pascal Sancho changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution||WORKSFORME --- Comment #1 from Pascal Sancho 2010-06-18 06:44:37 EDT --- Nabble redirects now to correct sites. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 48886] New: Links to Nabble archives are broken
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48886 Summary: Links to Nabble archives are broken Product: Fop Version: all Platform: PC OS/Version: Windows XP Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: documentation AssignedTo: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org ReportedBy: pascal.san...@takoma.fr The Nabble service seems to migrate to a new infrastructure. Current links in FOP documentation are referencing an empty site. URL to old Nabble are: http://old.nabble.com/FOP---Users-f353.html http://old.nabble.com/FOP---Dev-f352.html Note that old Nabble is currently up to date. -- Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email --- You are receiving this mail because: --- You are the assignee for the bug.
Re: Requested MARC to update mailing archives
Eyebrowse is discontinued. There's an effort under way to establish a map of Eyebrowse links to the mod_mbox archives. And they want to add full text search using Lucene to mod_mbox. No idea when that is going to happen though. :-( On 25.04.2005 16:44:51 Glen Mazza wrote: > Did you also request the same from Eyebrowse? I can > do so again if it would help. > > Glen > > --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I did on 2005-03-04 and got no response. Thanks for > > retrying. > > > > On 24.04.2005 23:43:05 Glen Mazza wrote: > > > I don't know if someone else has done so earlier > > (I > > > recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back), > > but > > > I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1] > > asking > > > them to switch their FOP lists to our new > > @xmlgraphics > > > addresses. I hope they will do so--our present > > > archives lists aren't very good--there's no > > searching > > > capability, etc. > > > > > > Glen > > > > > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > > > > Jeremias Maerki
Re: Requested MARC to update mailing archives
Did you also request the same from Eyebrowse? I can do so again if it would help. Glen --- Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I did on 2005-03-04 and got no response. Thanks for > retrying. > > On 24.04.2005 23:43:05 Glen Mazza wrote: > > I don't know if someone else has done so earlier > (I > > recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back), > but > > I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1] > asking > > them to switch their FOP lists to our new > @xmlgraphics > > addresses. I hope they will do so--our present > > archives lists aren't very good--there's no > searching > > capability, etc. > > > > Glen > > > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ > > > > > > Jeremias Maerki > >
Re: Requested MARC to update mailing archives
I did on 2005-03-04 and got no response. Thanks for retrying. On 24.04.2005 23:43:05 Glen Mazza wrote: > I don't know if someone else has done so earlier (I > recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back), but > I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1] asking > them to switch their FOP lists to our new @xmlgraphics > addresses. I hope they will do so--our present > archives lists aren't very good--there's no searching > capability, etc. > > Glen > > [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/ > Jeremias Maerki
Requested MARC to update mailing archives
I don't know if someone else has done so earlier (I recall Chris raising the issue a few weeks back), but I sent an email yesterday to the MARC list[1] asking them to switch their FOP lists to our new @xmlgraphics addresses. I hope they will do so--our present archives lists aren't very good--there's no searching capability, etc. Glen [1] http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/
Re: Archives
On 30.03.2005 16:33:16 Christian Geisert wrote: > Chris Bowditch schrieb: > > Jeremias Maerki wrote: > > > > Oh ... I see. Well thanks for looking into the MARC problem. Doesnt > > anyone @infrastructure have a contact there we can speak to directly? > > I don't think so. > Last time I contacted them directly via mail and they did set up the > fop-user archive within hours. > > > Its a tad inconvenient not being able to view previous posts on fop-dev > > ATM. > > As Jeremias already mentioned, mod_mbox seems to work (but has no > searching yet): > http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200503.mbox/threads.html I think there are plans to add full text search using Lucene into mod_mbox. > fop-dev is also availabe at The Mail Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/fop-dev%40xmlgraphics.apache.org/ > (looks like there is no link on the FOP website yet...) Ah, didn't remember that one. Too bad, the archives are now split between the old and the new name there. Jeremias Maerki
Re: Archives
Chris Bowditch schrieb: Jeremias Maerki wrote: Oh ... I see. Well thanks for looking into the MARC problem. Doesnt anyone @infrastructure have a contact there we can speak to directly? I don't think so. Last time I contacted them directly via mail and they did set up the fop-user archive within hours. Its a tad inconvenient not being able to view previous posts on fop-dev ATM. As Jeremias already mentioned, mod_mbox seems to work (but has no searching yet): http://mail-archives.eu.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200503.mbox/threads.html fop-dev is also availabe at The Mail Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/fop-dev%40xmlgraphics.apache.org/ (looks like there is no link on the FOP website yet...) Christian
Re: Archives
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Oh ... I see. Well thanks for looking into the MARC problem. Doesnt anyone @infrastructure have a contact there we can speak to directly? Its a tad inconvenient not being able to view previous posts on fop-dev ATM. Chris I've already sent a request to MARC but so far no response, nor action. Eyebrowse is being put to the grave as far as I know. mod_mbox will take its place. They are currently creating a system that should map old Eyebrowse links to the mod_mbox system. BTW, infrastructure is still not finished with the whole machine migration and reorganization. On 30.03.2005 12:08:55 Chris Bowditch wrote: I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until 12th March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do to ensure all future posts are saved in the Archives? The links on the website to eyebrowse also appear to be broken. Chris Jeremias Maerki
Re: Archives
I've already sent a request to MARC but so far no response, nor action. Eyebrowse is being put to the grave as far as I know. mod_mbox will take its place. They are currently creating a system that should map old Eyebrowse links to the mod_mbox system. BTW, infrastructure is still not finished with the whole machine migration and reorganization. On 30.03.2005 12:08:55 Chris Bowditch wrote: > I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until > 12th > March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do > to ensure all future posts are saved in the Archives? > > The links on the website to eyebrowse also appear to be broken. > > Chris Jeremias Maerki
Archives
I just noticed that the Archives held at MARC only contain posts up until 12th March when the mailing lists were moved to xmlgraphics. What do we need to do to ensure all future posts are saved in the Archives? The links on the website to eyebrowse also appear to be broken. Chris
