https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098
Glenn Adams gl...@skynav.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jan 11, 2006, at 20:52, gerhard oettl wrote:
Hi Gerhard,
snip /
Only to be shure that i have not missed anything. - Is there any
work open from my side that holds back the patch?
Not really. I have this on my TODO list, going to have a look at
those darn' column-numbers again anyway ;-)
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:00:59PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jan 11, 2006, at 20:52, gerhard oettl wrote:
Is there any work open from my side that holds back the patch?
Not really.
Thanks that all I want to know.
I have this on my TODO list, going to have a look at
those darn'
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 20:22, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 14:55, gerhard oettl wrote:
as far as i can see this cannot be assurred for table-cell with
the current code at the point this function is called.
Hmmm...
On Jan 5, 2006, at 11:42, gerhard oettl wrote:
On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 08:37:31PM +0100, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 20:22, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
To expand, a little remark: try '((TableCell) pInfo.getFO
()).getColumnNumber()'
This was the beginning of my illness some
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Jan 4, 2006, at 14:55, gerhard oettl wrote:
snip /
[Me:]
given:
a) that the column-numbers are all properly initialized
as far as i can see this cannot be assurred for table-cell with
the current code at the point this function is called.
Hmmm... The columns will always be available,
On Jan 4, 2006, at 20:22, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Jan 4, 2006, at 14:55, gerhard oettl wrote:
as far as i can see this cannot be assurred for table-cell with
the current code at the point this function is called.
Hmmm... The columns will always be available, with properly
initialized
Changes common to
1) MergePropsFunction.java:
2) SystemFontFunction.java:
- ATTENTION - NONEXISTENT!
Though the PropertyParser does a call to
new MergePropsFunction() and
new SystemFontFunction()
greping through the codebase i cannot find such classes.
oops - didn't look
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38098.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
14 matches
Mail list logo
