https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Glenn Adams changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #33 from Glenn Ad
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Vincent Hennebert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #31 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-13
10:15:35 UTC ---
Hi Benoît,
(In reply to comment #25)
> table-and-caption and table-caption are not supported by FOP but they do not
> crash the engine
> On the Accessibility branch, a fil
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #30 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-09
02:29:20 PDT ---
Jost or Jeremias,
In the PDFPainter.prepareImageMCID method, there is a "fix for Acro Checker"
comment. Do you have a sample FO file triggering that bug in Acrobat? I have
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #29 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-10-02 00:49:27
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> But why are images handled like text, using marked-content sequences? IIUC
> they
> should be handled as PDF Objects (see "PDF Object as Content
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #28 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01
09:34:41 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #27)
> (In reply to comment #24)
> > Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an
> > fo:external-graphic referring to a
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #27 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-10-01 09:13:20
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #24)
> Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an
> fo:external-graphic referring to a PNG image. The alt-text isn't rea
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #26 from benoit.wi...@gmail.com 2009-10-01 09:03:41 PDT ---
the NPE is at the line
structElemType.put(ptr, structElem.get("S").toString());
structElem.get("S") returns null
it seems to be caused by FOToPDFRoleMap.mapFormattingO
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
benoit.wi...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||benoit.wi...@gmail.com
--
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #25 from benoit.wi...@gmail.com 2009-10-01 08:19:20 PDT ---
table-and-caption and table-caption are not supported by FOP but they do not
crash the engine
On the Accessibility branch, a file with a table-and-caption / table-captio
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #24 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01
04:10:58 PDT ---
Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an
fo:external-graphic referring to a PNG image. The alt-text isn't read aloud by
Acrobat, and the
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #23 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01
04:05:43 PDT ---
The number tree corresponding to the ParentTree entry in the StructTreeRoot
object is invalid, as the values are directly stored in the array instead of
being reference. Se
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #22 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01
04:02:45 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #21)
> I've just noticed that the structure tree stored in the IF XML is not
> re-parsed. Running FOP with the IF as input (-afin) and the -a switch ev
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #21 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-09-22
04:59:24 PDT ---
I've just noticed that the structure tree stored in the IF XML is not
re-parsed. Running FOP with the IF as input (-afin) and the -a switch even
leads to a NPE. So tagged P
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #20 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-09-17
09:07:20 PDT ---
Note: I've been asked to look at integrating this patch into Trunk, but also to
implement tagged PDF in the legacy PDFRenderer. More later.
Vincent
--
Configure bugmail:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #19 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-06-26
03:48:13 PST ---
I've been (slowly) reviewing the patch and I noticed that classes in the
layoutmgr package are affected by the changes. There's no reason why it should
be the case, la
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Andreas L. Delmelle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vinayak.pat...@gmail.com
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #17 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-04-17 07:42:17
PST ---
Most of the feedback has now been incorporated into the development branch. One
notable exception is the discussion around replacing foi:ptr with the "id"
property but I
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #16 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-19 11:58:34
PST ---
I've applied the patch (2009-02-19 02:23 PST) to a new branch as discussed
(with modifications). The code is now under:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Jeremias Maerki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23262|0 |1
is patch|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Jeremias Maerki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23261|0 |1
is patch|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Jeremias Maerki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #23250|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #15 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-19
02:23:01 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23278)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23278)
added compiled stylesheets for improved performance in server environm
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-18
15:22:09 PST ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> (In reply to comment #12)
>
> I would assume: no.
FWIW, just checked the XML and XPath specifications, and that one question
regarding
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #13 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-18 11:50:41
PST ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Since we have two passes, are we still 100% certain that the XSLT processor
> will always return unique values that are used nowhere as an i
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #12 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-18
11:28:58 PST ---
(In reply to comment #11)
>
> On Andreas' comments: I didn't realize that the spec says to initialize the
> "id" property to an initial value. Of course, it would m
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #11 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-18 01:20:59
PST ---
Jost asked me off-list about my opinion on Vincent's feedback. I'll put it
here. Generally good input. The merging of TransformerNode and
TransformerNodeEndProcessing is
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #10 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-17
22:21:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #9)
> The approach with the @id seems a bit risky. The @ptr replacement has to have
> unique values. What happens if a user has a few empty @id
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #9 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-17
22:10:25 PST ---
Hi Andreas,
The approach with the @id seems a bit risky. The @ptr replacement has to have
unique values. What happens if a user has a few empty @id in his FO or multiple
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #8 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-17
12:51:03 PST ---
Interesting stuff! I've also read some of the Wiki, and one thought that popped
in my head:
Do we really need the extension 'ptr'? Could this be simplified by using
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #7 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-02-17
03:00:27 PST ---
That's great new functionality. I've only had time to look at a part of the
patch so far, so I'm posting my few comments below. More later if I have time.
In the o.a.f
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #6 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-16
13:06:21 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23262)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23262)
Removed unused code in area/inline/Image & related
[Jeremias:]area/inl
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #5 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-16
12:44:31 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=23261)
--> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23261)
Fixed NPE when used from command line
--
Configure bugmail: https://
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #4 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-16 05:54:06
PST ---
Generally, the patch looks pretty good to me, besides the NPE which I know Jost
is already working on a fix for. That particular bug occurs because the
stylesheets get lo
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
--- Comment #3 from Chris Bowditch 2009-02-16
02:52:44 PST ---
Hi Jost,
I've just been trying out your patch. I applied the patch to a fresh check out
of the new IF branch, compiled it okay. But when I tried to generate a PDF from
th
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705
Jeremias Maerki changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Keywords|
36 matches
Mail list logo
