DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2012-03-31 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Glenn Adams changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #33 from Glenn Ad

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2010-01-11 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Vincent Hennebert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-13 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #31 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-13 10:15:35 UTC --- Hi BenoƮt, (In reply to comment #25) > table-and-caption and table-caption are not supported by FOP but they do not > crash the engine > On the Accessibility branch, a fil

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-09 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #30 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-09 02:29:20 PDT --- Jost or Jeremias, In the PDFPainter.prepareImageMCID method, there is a "fix for Acro Checker" comment. Do you have a sample FO file triggering that bug in Acrobat? I have

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-02 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #29 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-10-02 00:49:27 PDT --- (In reply to comment #28) > But why are images handled like text, using marked-content sequences? IIUC > they > should be handled as PDF Objects (see "PDF Object as Content

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #28 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01 09:34:41 PDT --- (In reply to comment #27) > (In reply to comment #24) > > Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an > > fo:external-graphic referring to a

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #27 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-10-01 09:13:20 PDT --- (In reply to comment #24) > Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an > fo:external-graphic referring to a PNG image. The alt-text isn't rea

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #26 from benoit.wi...@gmail.com 2009-10-01 09:03:41 PDT --- the NPE is at the line structElemType.put(ptr, structElem.get("S").toString()); structElem.get("S") returns null it seems to be caused by FOToPDFRoleMap.mapFormattingO

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 benoit.wi...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||benoit.wi...@gmail.com --

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #25 from benoit.wi...@gmail.com 2009-10-01 08:19:20 PDT --- table-and-caption and table-caption are not supported by FOP but they do not crash the engine On the Accessibility branch, a file with a table-and-caption / table-captio

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #24 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01 04:10:58 PDT --- Are images supposed to work? I've tested a simple document that contains an fo:external-graphic referring to a PNG image. The alt-text isn't read aloud by Acrobat, and the

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #23 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01 04:05:43 PDT --- The number tree corresponding to the ParentTree entry in the StructTreeRoot object is invalid, as the values are directly stored in the array instead of being reference. Se

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-10-01 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #22 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-10-01 04:02:45 PDT --- (In reply to comment #21) > I've just noticed that the structure tree stored in the IF XML is not > re-parsed. Running FOP with the IF as input (-afin) and the -a switch ev

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-09-22 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #21 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-09-22 04:59:24 PDT --- I've just noticed that the structure tree stored in the IF XML is not re-parsed. Running FOP with the IF as input (-afin) and the -a switch even leads to a NPE. So tagged P

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-09-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #20 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-09-17 09:07:20 PDT --- Note: I've been asked to look at integrating this patch into Trunk, but also to implement tagged PDF in the legacy PDFRenderer. More later. Vincent -- Configure bugmail:

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-06-26 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #19 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-06-26 03:48:13 PST --- I've been (slowly) reviewing the patch and I noticed that classes in the layoutmgr package are affected by the changes. There's no reason why it should be the case, la

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-06-05 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Andreas L. Delmelle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vinayak.pat...@gmail.com

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-04-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #17 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-04-17 07:42:17 PST --- Most of the feedback has now been incorporated into the development branch. One notable exception is the discussion around replacing foi:ptr with the "id" property but I

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #16 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-19 11:58:34 PST --- I've applied the patch (2009-02-19 02:23 PST) to a new branch as discussed (with modifications). The code is now under: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/xmlgraphics/fop/

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23262|0 |1 is patch|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23261|0 |1 is patch|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23250|0 |1 is obsolete|

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-19 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #15 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-19 02:23:01 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23278) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23278) added compiled stylesheets for improved performance in server environm

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #14 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-18 15:22:09 PST --- (In reply to comment #13) > (In reply to comment #12) > > I would assume: no. FWIW, just checked the XML and XPath specifications, and that one question regarding

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #13 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-18 11:50:41 PST --- (In reply to comment #12) > Since we have two passes, are we still 100% certain that the XSLT processor > will always return unique values that are used nowhere as an i

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #12 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-18 11:28:58 PST --- (In reply to comment #11) > > On Andreas' comments: I didn't realize that the spec says to initialize the > "id" property to an initial value. Of course, it would m

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-18 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #11 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-18 01:20:59 PST --- Jost asked me off-list about my opinion on Vincent's feedback. I'll put it here. Generally good input. The merging of TransformerNode and TransformerNodeEndProcessing is

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #10 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-17 22:21:47 PST --- (In reply to comment #9) > The approach with the @id seems a bit risky. The @ptr replacement has to have > unique values. What happens if a user has a few empty @id

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #9 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-17 22:10:25 PST --- Hi Andreas, The approach with the @id seems a bit risky. The @ptr replacement has to have unique values. What happens if a user has a few empty @id in his FO or multiple

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #8 from Andreas L. Delmelle 2009-02-17 12:51:03 PST --- Interesting stuff! I've also read some of the Wiki, and one thought that popped in my head: Do we really need the extension 'ptr'? Could this be simplified by using

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-17 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #7 from Vincent Hennebert 2009-02-17 03:00:27 PST --- That's great new functionality. I've only had time to look at a part of the patch so far, so I'm posting my few comments below. More later if I have time. In the o.a.f

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #6 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-16 13:06:21 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23262) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23262) Removed unused code in area/inline/Image & related [Jeremias:]area/inl

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #5 from Jost Klopfstein 2009-02-16 12:44:31 PST --- Created an attachment (id=23261) --> (https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23261) Fixed NPE when used from command line -- Configure bugmail: https://

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #4 from Jeremias Maerki 2009-02-16 05:54:06 PST --- Generally, the patch looks pretty good to me, besides the NPE which I know Jost is already working on a fix for. That particular bug occurs because the stylesheets get lo

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-16 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 --- Comment #3 from Chris Bowditch 2009-02-16 02:52:44 PST --- Hi Jost, I've just been trying out your patch. I applied the patch to a fresh check out of the new IF branch, compiled it okay. But when I tried to generate a PDF from th

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 46705] [PATCH] Enhancement: PDF Accessibility

2009-02-12 Thread bugzilla
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46705 Jeremias Maerki changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|