Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-18 Thread Peter Hancock
+1 On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Chris Bowditch wrote: > On 15/06/2012 11:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: >> >> As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the >> Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some >> clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating th

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-18 Thread Chris Bowditch
On 15/06/2012 11:25, Vincent Hennebert wrote: As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). We have been using the code from this branch fo

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-16 Thread mehdi houshmand
+1 On 15 June 2012 16:15, Clay Leeds wrote: > I was going to say that Pascal had a good point, and that it was really up > to Glenn. > > +1 from me > > "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." > - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet > > On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > > > Ok

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Clay Leeds
I was going to say that Pascal had a good point, and that it was really up to Glenn. +1 from me "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Ok, > then... > +1 for me > > 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams : >> If Vinc

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Pascal Sancho
Ok, then... +1 for me 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams : > If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge > to trunk. So I'd say +1. > > > On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Glenn Adams
If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge to trunk. So I'd say +1. On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho wrote: > Hi, > > Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure > it's time to merge such branch to trunk. > I guess this new fe

Re: [VOTE] Merge Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch into trunk

2012-06-15 Thread Pascal Sancho
Hi, Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure it's time to merge such branch to trunk. I guess this new feature will not be part of the 1.1 release. If merging have to be done quickly, then we should create a 1.1 maintenance branch to ensure that merging will not affect