I was going to say that Pascal had a good point, and that it was really up to 

+1 from me

"My religion is simple. My religion is kindness."
- HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet

On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> wrote:

> Ok,
> then...
> +1 for me
> 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>:
>> If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge
>> to trunk. So I'd say +1.
>> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure
>>> it's time to merge such branch to trunk.
>>> I guess this new feature will not be part of the 1.1 release.
>>> If merging have to be done quickly, then we should create a 1.1
>>> maintenance branch to ensure that merging will not affect the
>>> releasing process.
>>> Or if this new feature have to be part of the 1.1 release, then
>>> perhaps we have to delay the release process *after* this merge.
>>> any thought?
>>> 2012/6/15 Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>:
>>>> As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the
>>>> Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some
>>>> clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4).
>>>> We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and
>>>> it has proven to work reasonably well. I won’t hide the fact that some
>>>> parts of the code are truly ugly (in PSFontUtils mainly), but it’s not
>>>> possible to clean that up without heavily refactoring the font
>>>> sub-system, which I unfortunately can’t spend time on right now. At
>>>> least the ugliness is fairly self-contained. Meanwhile some users may
>>>> find the additional functionality useful.
>>>> So I’d like to propose a vote for merging that branch back to Trunk. The
>>>> vote will run until Thursday 21st, 8:00GMT.
>>>> Here’s my +1.
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Vincent
> -- 
> pascal

Reply via email to