I was going to say that Pascal had a good point, and that it was really up to Glenn.
+1 from me "My religion is simple. My religion is kindness." - HH The Dalai Lama of Tibet On Jun 15, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, > then... > +1 for me > > 2012/6/15 Glenn Adams <gl...@skynav.com>: >> If Vincent would like this in the 1.1 release, then I'm in favor of a merge >> to trunk. So I'd say +1. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:29 AM, Pascal Sancho <psancho....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since Glenn is in the process to release the FOP v1.1, I'm not sure >>> it's time to merge such branch to trunk. >>> I guess this new feature will not be part of the 1.1 release. >>> >>> If merging have to be done quickly, then we should create a 1.1 >>> maintenance branch to ensure that merging will not affect the >>> releasing process. >>> >>> Or if this new feature have to be part of the 1.1 release, then >>> perhaps we have to delay the release process *after* this merge. >>> >>> any thought? >>> >>> 2012/6/15 Vincent Hennebert <vhenneb...@gmail.com>: >>>> As you may have noticed, I’ve recently spent some time updating the >>>> Temp_TrueTypeInPostScript branch to the latest trunk and doing some >>>> clean-up (thanks to Robert for updating the testcases to JUnit 4). >>>> >>>> We have been using the code from this branch for quite a while now and >>>> it has proven to work reasonably well. I won’t hide the fact that some >>>> parts of the code are truly ugly (in PSFontUtils mainly), but it’s not >>>> possible to clean that up without heavily refactoring the font >>>> sub-system, which I unfortunately can’t spend time on right now. At >>>> least the ugliness is fairly self-contained. Meanwhile some users may >>>> find the additional functionality useful. >>>> >>>> So I’d like to propose a vote for merging that branch back to Trunk. The >>>> vote will run until Thursday 21st, 8:00GMT. >>>> >>>> Here’s my +1. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Vincent > > -- > pascal
