Thanks for all your feedbacks.
Hearing no objections, I’ll then commit the change in the next days.
Vincent
Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The title may be a little cryptic for those who aren’t familiar with the
> table layout code :-\ But basically it corresponds to the following:
>
> Wh
Vincent,
> > both of them I'd prefer to see split onto two pages. So imo a high
> > penalty is better
> That will still be possible with the infinite penalty (assuming your
> "1.5 pages" contain enough break possibilities in between). The rule
> here is only to make sure that every column contribu
On 09.01.2008 16:19:33 Max Berger wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> please consider the case where a table cell is long, or even longer than
> a page. In this case it should break it anyways. Also, consider these
> cases:
>
> ++
> | 0.25 pages |
> ++
> | 1.5 pages |
> ++
+1
I guess it makes sense.
On 09.01.2008 15:27:29 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The title may be a little cryptic for those who aren’t familiar with the
> table layout code :-\ But basically it corresponds to the following:
>
> When a row starts at the bottom of a page, there may not be en
On Jan 9, 2008, at 18:59, Jay Bryant wrote:
Hi Jay,
My opinion doesn't count, but I'm for it.
Just wondering:
What do you mean by "doesn't count"? You are a committer, so your
opinion most definitely counts here... :-)
Cheers
Andreas
On Jan 9, 2008, at 15:27, Vincent Hennebert wrote:
Hi Vincent,
Currently, a 900 penalty is assigned to such a break possibility, to
avoid as much as possible this situation from occurring.
However, it doesn’t completely prevent it, as we have seen recently on
fop-users. My proposal is to for
My opinion doesn't count, but I'm for it. For me and my customers, a cell
that begins on one page and ends on another is never desirable.
Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services
http://www.bryantcs.com/
Hi Max,
Max Berger wrote:
> Vincent,
>
> please consider the case where a table cell is long, or even longer than
> a page. In this case it should break it anyways. Also, consider these
> cases:
Well this is a different issue. The fact that at least the beginning of
each cell should be present
Vincent,
please consider the case where a table cell is long, or even longer than
a page. In this case it should break it anyways. Also, consider these
cases:
++
| 0.25 pages |
++
| 1.5 pages |
++
| 0.25 pages |
++
+---+
| 0.5 pages |
+
