On Nov 28, 2005, at 19:56, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Hmm... forgot to mention that running this test without an Exception
may require one of my most recent adaptations in the treatment of
fo:characters. AFAICT, remove() came down to changing the character
value to CHAR_EOT,
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 02:56 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Hi all,
I guess this one is for Manuel, since the above mentioned testcase
was submitted by him, but if anyone can offer further feedback (or
confirm/refute my suspicions :-)), feel free to share your
thoughts...
Andreas,
you read far
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:21 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Nov 28, 2005, at 19:56, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Hmm... forgot to mention that running this test without an Exception
may require one of my most recent adaptations in the treatment of
fo:characters. AFAICT, remove() came
On Nov 29, 2005, at 00:27, Manuel Mall wrote:
On Tue, 29 Nov 2005 03:21 am, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
snip /
Be warned that if you run this test off the trunk, you may receive
ugly errors.
Not really - if you use fop trunk to produce a PDF from that test it
does it without a single error.
