Re: IntMap.java
Vincent Hennebert wrote: Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and require 1.5 as a minimum? :-] A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet. If the usage of those hash maps is only in a few places, we could provide JDK dependent code and tell people that FOP runs faster on JDK 1.5. J.Pietschmann
Re: IntMap.java
J.Pietschmann wrote: Vincent Hennebert wrote: Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and require 1.5 as a minimum? :-] A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet. If the usage of those hash maps is only in a few places, we could provide JDK dependent code and tell people that FOP runs faster on JDK 1.5. J.Pietschmann FOP should run markedly faster on 1.6 without any changes. Just about everything else does. -- Peter B. West http://cv.pbw.id.au/ Folio http://defoe.sourceforge.net/folio/
Re: IntMap.java
J.Pietschmann wrote: Vincent Hennebert wrote: Shall we launch a poll on fop-user about abandoning support for 1.4 and require 1.5 as a minimum? :-] A poll: maybe. Abandoning 1.3: Not yet. Did you mean 1.4 here? I thought we had all agreed to drop support for 1.3 now? I have long argued that we maintain support for it due to the length of time it takes for more recent JDKs to become available for ancient o/s which large organisations tend to use to run their batch processes on. AFICT, 98% of all o/s can now support 1.4, but not yet 1.5 so we shouldn't drop support for 1.4 for a while yet but I think its safe to drop 1.3 support. snip/ Chris
