On Wed, 2005-08-31 at 10:07 +0200, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right
> signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and
> people can start looking at the new package.
I would recommend calling it 0.90, since obviously
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right
signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and
people can start looking at the new package.
(..)
Jeremias Maerki
I agree, we have to be carefull to send the right message.
Patric
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
The subject says it all:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ReleasePlanFirstPR
This is open for discussion. I'd really love to get the first release
out by the end of September.
Thats a good objective. I've reviewed the plan and it looks good. I
noticed that there
On 31.08.2005 10:29:07 Manuel Mall wrote:
> On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:07 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right
> > signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and
> > people can start looking at the new package.
> >
>
On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 04:07 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right
> signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and
> people can start looking at the new package.
>
Fine, not a problem for me.
> We don't just have featu
Like others I'm hesitant to call it 1.0 just yet. 0.9 sends the right
signal IMO. We're not quite where we want to be but we are soon and
people can start looking at the new package.
We don't just have features that exceed FOP 0.20.5. We also have points
where FOP Trunk is still inferior to 0.20.5
Excellent - I like the sound of it :-).
Personally, after having now used the trunk a bit and seeing the test
cases, etc., I would be a bit "bolder" and go for a name like "1.0
alpha" or "1.0EA" (I think that's the terminology Sun is using for
unstable early releases). The big disclaimers still