Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP

2006-05-03 Thread Max Berger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear Gennadiy, thank you for your very extensive answer. At least now I know what the current status is. So for now I'll use jeuclid externally to convert so svg and then include that into fop. Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: > The reasons for rare comm

Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP

2006-05-03 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hi Gennadiy On 03.05.2006 16:14:41 Gennadiy Tsarenkov wrote: > Hello Jeremias, > > I'm not saying that this is simple, I'm just saying pre-conditions, > when we would be able to continue invest our efforts into integration > into FOP. You are absolutely right, saying that there should

Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP

2006-05-03 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I forgot to CC the jeuclid list when I replied to Max. Here's the link: http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/xmlgraphics-fop-dev/200604.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Just in case... The whole thing about bringing JEuclid into the XML Graphics project is not that simple. As I said before, this would

Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP

2006-05-03 Thread Gennadiy Tsarenkov
Dear Max, results of our work (not the latest one, but still good enough for publishing) is available from cvs.sourceforge.net/cvsroot/jeuclid. Now I'm waiting for feedback from anyone of Apache FOP members on review the JEuclid code. At the moment, I have no idea whether some work has been

Re: Question about status of JEuclid and possible inclusion in FOP

2006-04-30 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 29.04.2006 21:33:17 Max Berger wrote: > Dear Gennady, > Dear developers, > > I've just recently played around with mathml and tried to include > that in my fop documents. I've found several tools, and among others > "jeuclid". jeuclid is very complete, it is just missing a few adapter >