Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a
> 0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for
I thought we do it like 0.91alpha2, ... 0.93 beta ... 1.0
> discussion. I don't care too much about it.
What do others think?
C
Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a
0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for
discussion. I don't care too much about it.
On 24.11.2005 17:56:23 Christian Geisert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
>
> > Going back to SVN Trunk mode.
>
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Going back to SVN Trunk mode.
[..]
> -
> +
Shouldn't this become 0.91svn?
--
Christian
