On 18.04.2008 16:10:30 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> >> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> >>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
> >> - invalid param usage: use -param
> >> - you must specify the number of copies
> >> - the USAGE m
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
>> - invalid param usage: use -param
>> - you must specify the number of copies
>> - the USAGE messages
>
> These are part of the command-line interface which
On 18.04.2008 13:01:09 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> > Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
>
> - invalid param usage: use -param
> - you must specify the number of copies
> - the USAGE messages
These are part of the command-line interface which must interface with
System.o
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
- invalid param usage: use -param
- you must specify the number of copies
- value must be a positive integer
- the USAGE messages
And probably others.
> On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
>> Hi Jeremias,
>>
>> why don't
Hmm, I don't see any relevant ones.
On 18.04.2008 11:28:48 Vincent Hennebert wrote:
> Hi Jeremias,
>
> why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the
> notifications we can find in the code below?
>
> Vincent
Jeremias Maerki
Hi Jeremias,
why don't you use the new processing feedback mechanism for the
notifications we can find in the code below?
Vincent
> Author: jeremias
> Date: Thu Apr 17 08:12:23 2008
> New Revision: 649146
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=649146&view=rev
> Log:
> Bugzilla #41687:
> Rest