Re: keep with next(Attribute)

Hi Sako, may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next? i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the next page. or only the title shines in one page and the text(paragraph) in the next? keep-with-next is only implemented for table rows, so one solution is to create a table,

Re: keep with next(Attribute)

- From: Paul Vinkenoog [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: FOP [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 1:01 PM Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute) Hi Sako, may i ask, how do u solve the problem with keep with next? i mean when sometimes only one line shines in the next page. or only

RE: keep with next(Attribute)

Title: RE: keep with next(Attribute) You might want to look at XEP www.renderx.com -Original Message- From: Eclipse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, September 16, 2004 8:15 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: keep with next(Attribute) thank you for answer. here is my

Re: keep-with-next on last row in table-head doesn't work

olts Jn wrote: Could anybody help me with this task: How to avoid FOP to place table header at the end of the page following with no more rows on that page? Setting keep-with-next on the last row of table's table-head doesn't work. Table header is still at the bottom of the page. As you are

Re: keep-with-next

From: Frank Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3 rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do this Your XSL-FO looks fine. keep-* properties are

RE: keep-with-next

- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2003 03:43 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: keep-with-next From: Frank Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3 rows displaying the details of each client. I want

Re: keep-with-next

Frank Daly wrote: fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always Try keep-with-next=always. I think FOP ignores within-page and uses within-column only. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

Re: keep-with-next

Frank Daly wrote: I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003. This was an 0.20.5RCsomething. You can drop in the latest FOP jar from a binary distro without problems. It wont make a difference with

RE: keep-with-next

-Original Message- From: Frank Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003. That would probably be 0.20.4 or one of the 0.20.5 release candidates. 0.20.5

RE: keep-with-next

That worked. Thanks very much, enjoy your weekend. Frank -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2003 04:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: keep-with-next Frank Daly wrote: fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always Try

Re: keep-with-next, and keep-with-previous in blocks

From: Ganesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi All, A block with keep-with-previous=always does not behave the way I want it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between pages. a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block? b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour?

Re: keep-with-next, and keep-with-previous in blocks

Ganesh wrote: A block with keep-with-previous=always does not behave the way I want it. Inspite of putting this tag for a block i have them splict between pages. a) Is it a non-implemented tag for fo:block? b) Is there any work around to acheive the desired behaviour? That's a FAQ:

Re: keep-with-next in blind table creates gaps on some pages

And if you set the keep-with-next only on the row with the title? That will keep the title with at least one subseqent block. On 28.05.2003 09:00:04 Nicolas Mazziotta wrote: I use blind tables to prevent titles from being severed from the following block. But... If the block is too large to

Re: keep-with-next in blind table creates gaps on some pages

Chris Bowditch wrote: what you need to solve this problem is widow and orphan properties on fo:block. They control the minimum number of lines that are allowed to appear by themselves, either at the start of a new page or at the bottom of an existing page. Trouble is they are not implemented in

Re: Keep-with-next in tables

Haitham, FWIW, I use fo:table-row keep-with-next=always/ and its works like a champ for me. Have you done various experiments with only two or three rows etc. to see under what conditions it does/doesn't work? In any event, I can assure you that under at least some conditions, it does work

Re: keep-with-next not working in tables bigger than two pages

Müller, Markus wrote: according to the compliance document, keep-with-next is supported on table rows. The sample file keep.fo also demonstrates keep-with-previous working. But extending that sample in a way, that a table does not fit on two pages, the keep-directives do not work any more. Making

Re: keep-with-next

i think keep with next work with table rows only - Original Message - From: Karen Mergner [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 10:23 AM Subject: keep-with-next Hi all, I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page, but

Re: keep-with-next

Karen Mergner wrote: I want to keep a headline together with the following text on a page, but it dosn't work. This is a FAQ http://xml.apache.org/fop/faq.html#faq-N101F7 J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: keep-with-next formatting problem

Additional information about this problem. I just ran a report that has more than two pages of data and after the second page, with the problem, all additional multi-page spans are correct. Must just be a problem with the first break. -Original Message- From: Matt Frame

Re: keep-with-next formatting problem

Matt Frame wrote: I have found when I use the keep-with-next and keep-with-previous attributes in my table that after a page break the formatting of the row is lost. All text is left justified instead of the indent I requested. The final row on the previous page and next row after the break

Re: keep-with-next problem

Morten Isaksen wrote: I have a table cell that spans multiple pages. Inside this table cell I would like to use the keep-with-next on a block to make sure this block and the next block is at the same page. FOP does not seem to care about this. The two blocks sometimes appears on different pages.

Re: keep-with-next and small-caps

Berg, Philip wrote: I'm trying to keep multiple rows together, like so: fo:table-row keep-with-next=always [ cells ] /fo:table-row fo:table-row keep-with-next=always [ cells ] /fo:table-row fo:table-row [ cells ] /fo:table-row That doesn't seem to keep it together though

Re: keep-with-next in fo:block

Martin Stockhammer wrote: what about the state of keep-with-next in fo:block? I want to keep headings together with their following paragraphs, but keep-with-next=always does not work within fo:block tags. Is it planned to release a new version of fop in the near future? It wont be in the next

Re: keep-with-next

I have found it to be unreliable as well. My experience was with trying to keep rows in a table from splitting across pages. I found that fo:table-row keep-together=always did the trick splendidly. - Original Message - From: Michal Kwiatek [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent:

Re: keep-with-next

Michal Kwiatek wrote: keep-with-next property does not seem to work. It is listed as 'implemented' in documentation, however theres a 'broken' note next to it. Has anyone had any experience with this one? The properties keep-with-next and keep-with-previous are only implemented for table rows. I