Title: RE: number-rows-spanned - Faster?
I have found nesting tables can be quite quick. If it is simple tables nest within another. If you get into nest 4, and 5 deep that is where there can be a slow down.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
J.Pietschmann wrote:
Clay Leeds wrote:
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
I'd try nested tables first, cells spanning rows occasionally create
nasty problems at page breaks.
J.Pietschmann
Thanks for the warning, but I *shouldn't*
Clay Leeds wrote:
I'm still wondering, and you're probably the person to ask: is FOP
faster with spanned rows or nested tables.
I don't know. There is more code and data involved if a nested
table is used, a row spanning cell however may cause some sort
of backtracking. Probably you'll need to
Clay Leeds wrote:
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
I'd try nested tables first, cells spanning rows occasionally create
nasty problems at page breaks.
J.Pietschmann
I use number-rows-spanned in 0.20.3:
fo:table-cell number-rows-spanned=2
/fo:table-cell
-Lou
Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] on 03/17/2003 11:47:37
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: FOP-User [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: number-rows-spanned
I successfully use
Lou,
Thanks for the quick reply. That's GREAT! A couple of questions:
1. Does it work in 0.20.4 and/or 0.20.5x?
2. Can you give me an example? I'd like to do something like this:
|===|
| | | |
| | | |
| | | |
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: number-rows-spanned
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2003 08:57:05 -0800
Lou,
Thanks for the quick reply. That's GREAT! A couple of questions:
1. Does it work in 0.20.4 and/or 0.20.5x?
2. Can you give me an example? I'd like to do somethin
Peter,
I appreciate the note. However, I'm already doing that and am instead
interested in implementing a non-nested version as I am inclined to
believe it will provide more optimized efficient results. Rob Stote's
e-mail earlier today showed a ~6% cut in processing time:
RESULTS FOR CALLED
Is it faster to nest my fo:tables or to use number-rows-spanned to
create more complicated tables?
--
Clay Leeds - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web Developer - Medata, Inc. - http://www.medata.com
PGP Public Key: https://mail.medata.com/pgp/cleeds.asc
]
cc:
Subject: Re: number-rows-spanned
Lou,
Thanks for the quick reply. That's GREAT! A couple of questions:
1. Does it work in 0.20.4 and/or 0.20.5x?
2. Can you give me an example? I'd like to do something like
Thanks Lou,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try it out and let me know. If it doesn't work, I'll send you the complete
xsl file that we use.
-Lou
Works fine. I actually modified a portion of my own code to see. It
still uses many nested tables, but my results did show a slight
improvement (which, of
On Mon, 2003-03-17 at 11:47, Clay Leeds wrote:
I successfully use number-columns-spanned in my XSL-FO files. However,
I can not figure out how to do number-rows-spanned correctly. I now
see in the FOP:Implemented:Properties section, that
number-columns-spanned is cited but
12 matches
Mail list logo
