How to repeat region-before over long text

2003-10-24 Thread Daniel Kuebler
Hello :-) I have a problem with repeating the region-before over a text that takes more than one page. The header will be generated on the first page of the text, but not over the second page. Here are the parts of my fo file : fo:simple-page-master master-name=PressMonitorClipping

Re: How to repeat region-before over long text

2003-10-24 Thread Chris Bowditch
From: Daniel Kuebler [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip/ Here are the parts of my fo file : fo:simple-page-master master-name=PressMonitorClipping margin-left=3cm margin-right=2cm fo:region-before region-name=region-header extent=60pt precedence=false / content in the non-body regions is automatically

keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Daly
Hi I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3 rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do this xsl:for-each select=client fo:table-row

Re: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread Chris Bowditch
From: Frank Daly [EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi I have a table which will list a number of clients. There are 2 or 3 rows displaying the details of each client. I want to keep these rows together and have the following code fragment which I hoped would do this Your XSL-FO looks fine. keep-* properties are

RE: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Daly
Thanks for your quick reply Chris I've tried it and it doesn't work. The page break splits two rows relating to one client. I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003. Frank -Original

Re: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread J.Pietschmann
Frank Daly wrote: fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always Try keep-with-next=always. I think FOP ignores within-page and uses within-column only. J.Pietschmann - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For

RE: How to repeat region-before over long text

2003-10-24 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Daniel Kuebler [EMAIL PROTECTED] snip/ snip/ Why dont you put this table in the fo:flow instead? 100% agreed, I think this is a clear case of 'overkill' so to speak... You can define a table with a header

Re: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread J.Pietschmann
Frank Daly wrote: I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003. This was an 0.20.5RCsomething. You can drop in the latest FOP jar from a binary distro without problems. It wont make a difference with

RE: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Frank Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm not sure which version of fop I'm using. I use cocoon 2.0.4 and fop came with that. This version of cocoon was released in march 2003. That would probably be 0.20.4 or one of the 0.20.5 release candidates. 0.20.5

RE: keep-with-next

2003-10-24 Thread Frank Daly
That worked. Thanks very much, enjoy your weekend. Frank -Original Message- From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 24 October 2003 04:25 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: keep-with-next Frank Daly wrote: fo:table-row keep-with-next.within-page=always Try

Re: [XSL-FO] Waht is default / what determines z-index of xsl-regions / static content?

2003-10-24 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Mike Trotman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can't find any mentions of this (but may have missed them) so my current impression is that this is undefined / implementation dependent. I believe you're correct on this--the spec is vague on this point, so you should take this issue as