Matthias Brunner wrote:
I have set up a test case
(http://blumenstrasse.vol.at/~mb/foptest.zip, 15KB) with all
necessary files included. Just copy all of them into a clean FOP
0.20.4 directory.
Then issue these commands:
./fop.sh -xml lpdoc.xml -xsl lp2pdf.xsl -pdf cli.pdf
./embedtest.sh lpdoc.
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 15:12, Matthias Brunner wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 December 2002 13:12, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> > Okay, next attempt: show us how are you running FOP from the
> > command line and from an embedding.
>
> I have set up a test case
> (http://blumenstrasse.vol.at/~mb/foptest
On Wednesday 04 December 2002 13:12, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> Okay, next attempt: show us how are you running FOP from the
> command line and from an embedding.
Oleg,
thanks for your commitment.
I have set up a test case
(http://blumenstrasse.vol.at/~mb/foptest.zip, 15KB) with all
necessary fil
Matthias Brunner wrote:
I copied fop.sh and changed only one line to start my class which I
copied to FOP_HOME/lib. So I think every setting and the classpath
will be the same.
Yet output remains different. I don't understand.
Software used: fop 0.20.4, JDK 1.4.1_01, Linux
Okay, next attempt: sh
On Tuesday 03 December 2002 20:11, Oleg Tkachenko wrote:
> > And fop -x ... did not even work!
>
> Did you mean -c?
No, -x for "dump all configuration settings".
>
> > Why are these differences?
>
> Make sure you are embedding FOP in the same way you are running it
> from command line (I mean the
Matthias Brunner wrote:
I have encountered the following problem:
Input files and stylesheets are *exactly* the same. 73 pages are
rendered regardless of whether calling from code/command line.
(Tried with both PDF and XML renderer)
But on page 63 and subsequent fop called from java code breaks