On Tuesday 10 August 2004 23:03, Johannes Franz wrote:
> The pngs are the lowest sized images i can get. If i increase the
> memory, which is allocated for java to the size that is necessary for
> the amount of images, my system really slows down and nearly hangs up.
> Is there perhaps an option to
On Tuesday 14 January 2003 23:20, Matthew L. Avizinis wrote:
> I have written an extension that I had discussed a while ago about
> writing page numbers to an alternate xml file while FOP is running. I
> submitted it a while ago. It has a number of properties that allow you
> to name the file, wh
Hi,
I want to embed an external SVG graphic in my fop document. This graphic
shall at some place contain the current page number of the document.
Is this possible? If not, is this a limitation of xsl:fo and/or SVG in
general or only of the current implementations of fop and/or Batik?
Regards,
On Thursday 10 July 2003 19:55, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Bernd Brandstetter wrote:
> > I want to embed an external SVG graphic in my fop document. This
> > graphic shall at some place contain the current page number of the
> > document.
>
> No. Well, unless you are wil
On Tuesday 05 August 2003 20:18, Clay Leeds wrote:
> Also, is there a way to make all bookmarks default to "expanded" I've
> tried the following, which, although not "expanded" gives better
> results (although "Totals Section" is still hidden):
Hi,
I recently made a patch to fop-0.20.5 which addr
On Monday 18 August 2003 16:18, Michael Mutschler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just tried to figure out, how to obtain the current version of fop.
>
> There is a nice method called
> org.apache.fop.apps.Version.getVersion(), which returns null, when you
> call it. Not very nice.
There must be something wron
On Wednesday 03 September 2003 21:48, J.Pietschmann wrote:
> Should be "1/1000 pt", not millipoint, unless you want to attract
> the wrath of the ISO community for using ISO prefixes with non-ISO
> measurement units...
What's the problem? I doubt that ISO owns a patent on those prefixes :-)
Bye,
Hi,
try keep-with-next.within-page="always" instead of only
keep-with-next="always". This worked for me.
Bye,
Bernd
On Thursday 06 May 2004 18:56, Selber Jean-François wrote:
> I want only to keep the row together with the next row .
> it is why I used keep-with-next
-
Hi,
I'm new to FOP and followed the discussions on this list for the last few
days since I'm currently trying to use XSL:FO to produce the PDF
documentation for a project database which is in XML format.
While I'm very satisfied with the resulting output, I have strong doubts
about the usabili
