RE: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-17 Thread David Wood
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002, Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:

> " I don't think a lengthy Java v. Ada conversation going on in this list
> would do much for the state of FOP as we know it, either"

Too late, here we go...  :)

-David



RE: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-17 Thread Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
From: Robert Leif
To: Carlos Araya and James Richardson.

I totally agree with James Richardson.
" I don't think a lengthy Java v. Ada conversation going on in this list

would do much for the state of FOP as we know it, either"

Carlos Araya wrote: "3. What compilers currently available as open
source can compile ADA as a cross platform product like Java's
bytecode?"

--
--
--  GNAT DOCUMENTS
--
--
--
--   G N A T I N F O . T X T
--
--
--
--GNAT version 3.13p
--
--
--
-- Copyright (C) 1992 - 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
--
--
--
-- GNAT is free software;  you can  redistribute it  and/or modify it
under --
-- terms of the  GNU General Public License as published  by the Free
Soft- --
-- ware  Foundation;  either version 2,  or (at your option) any later
ver- --
-- sion.  GNAT is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
WITH- --
-- OUT ANY WARRANTY;  without even the  implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY --
-- or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public
License --
-- for  more details.  You should have  received  a copy of the GNU
General --
-- Public License  distributed with GNAT;  see file COPYING.  If not,
write --
-- to  the Free Software Foundation,  59 Temple Place - Suite 330,
Boston, --
-- MA 02111-1307, USA.
--
--
--
-- GNAT was originally developed  by the GNAT team at  New York
University. --
-- It is now maintained by Ada Core Technologies Inc
(http://www.gnat.com). --
--
--

http://www.gnat.com/ Very good, but expensive
ftp://ftp.cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/3.13p/ free
For more information see http://www.adapower.com/

-Original Message-
From: Carlos Araya [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 2:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!

Robert:

It may be so, Ada may indeed be 1000% more robust than Java, however
this
being an open source development effort I question your proclamation
that
everything should switch to Ada on 3 levels:

1. How many Ada programmers do you know who have the time commitment and
dedication to stay with an open source project. If I remember correctly
the
few Ada programmers I know are booked solid for the next couple years.

2. How serious are you about retraining all the developers who
contribute
code to FOP (starting with the original developer who still has commit
privileges) in a language who, for many, is an unknown. It's easier to
demand a better language and more and more stuff but we also need to
remember that these folks are doing it for free, on their own time.

3. What compilers currently available as open source can compile ADA as
a
cross platform product like Java's bytecode? If there are any (I'm only
familiar with ADA through people who work with it) are they deployed as
widely as the JDK/JRE is for Java?

If it's that important to you that the code is written in Ada, go ahead,
get
the source and translate it, then come show us how wrong we were. Until
then
I honestly don't think it should change... It's not just an exercise on
how
powerful the underlying language is but on how many people uses it

And, with all due respect, What on earth do the 777 and the french
railroad
have to do with this discussion?

Carlos

On 01/16/02 14:20, "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Bob Leif,
> To: James Richardson
> I am dead serious. Evidently, you have had no experience with Ada 95.
> Ada is much better at modeling XML than Java. I realize that Java is a
> marketing success. Unfortunately, it is based to a great extent on
> obsolete technology. For instance, it lacks: generics (templates),
> enumerated types, and range checking. Ada is also safe enough for the
> Boeing 777 flight control system and the French railroads.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
> 
> Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Bob Leif,
>> It seems that the Java underlying FOP is a source of a significant
>> number of problems. I would suggest that the developers switch to a
> much
>> more reliable and efficient object oriented technology, Ada. Since
Ada
>> is an ISO standard and has an extensive validation suite, it is much
>> more portable than Java. The GNAT (GNU) Ada compiler can produce both
> J
>> codes and fully compiled executables.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Wow, is it April already?
> 
> 

-- 
Carlos E. Araya
---+ WebCT Administrator/Trainer
 P | California Virtual Campus
 - | C/O De Anza College
 G | 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd
---+ Cupertino, CA 95014

email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web http://www.cvc1.org/ (work)
   

Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread James Richardson
Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:

From: Bob Leif,
To: James Richardson
I am dead serious. Evidently, you have had no experience with Ada 95.
Ada is much better at modeling XML than Java. I realize that Java is a
marketing success. Unfortunately, it is based to a great extent on
obsolete technology. For instance, it lacks: generics (templates),
enumerated types, and range checking. Ada is also safe enough for the
Boeing 777 flight control system and the French railroads.


Look, I know your Commodore 64 is much better than my Amstrad, but thats 
not really the point. Ada may well be great (Or it might not be, that's 
not the point I'm making), but its use in non 
educational/military/safety critical systems is limited. Even if 
somebody were to write a super-dooper FO transformer in ada, working for 
a large company, I probably couldn't use it, as my applications are all 
java, and the integration would be difficult.

If you want, please write  in ada, but just popping 
your head round the door, and saying "'drop everything!' this other 
thing is much better" accomplishes little.

I don't think a lengthy Java v. Ada conversation going on in this list 
would do much for the state of FOP as we know it, either

Best Regards,
James


Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread Carlos Araya
Robert:

It may be so, Ada may indeed be 1000% more robust than Java, however this
being an open source development effort I question your proclamation that
everything should switch to Ada on 3 levels:

1. How many Ada programmers do you know who have the time commitment and
dedication to stay with an open source project. If I remember correctly the
few Ada programmers I know are booked solid for the next couple years.

2. How serious are you about retraining all the developers who contribute
code to FOP (starting with the original developer who still has commit
privileges) in a language who, for many, is an unknown. It's easier to
demand a better language and more and more stuff but we also need to
remember that these folks are doing it for free, on their own time.

3. What compilers currently available as open source can compile ADA as a
cross platform product like Java's bytecode? If there are any (I'm only
familiar with ADA through people who work with it) are they deployed as
widely as the JDK/JRE is for Java?

If it's that important to you that the code is written in Ada, go ahead, get
the source and translate it, then come show us how wrong we were. Until then
I honestly don't think it should change... It's not just an exercise on how
powerful the underlying language is but on how many people uses it

And, with all due respect, What on earth do the 777 and the french railroad
have to do with this discussion?

Carlos

On 01/16/02 14:20, "Robert C. Leif, Ph.D." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> From: Bob Leif,
> To: James Richardson
> I am dead serious. Evidently, you have had no experience with Ada 95.
> Ada is much better at modeling XML than Java. I realize that Java is a
> marketing success. Unfortunately, it is based to a great extent on
> obsolete technology. For instance, it lacks: generics (templates),
> enumerated types, and range checking. Ada is also safe enough for the
> Boeing 777 flight control system and the French railroads.
> 
> -Original Message-
> From: James Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:38 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
> 
> Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> From: Bob Leif,
>> It seems that the Java underlying FOP is a source of a significant
>> number of problems. I would suggest that the developers switch to a
> much
>> more reliable and efficient object oriented technology, Ada. Since Ada
>> is an ISO standard and has an extensive validation suite, it is much
>> more portable than Java. The GNAT (GNU) Ada compiler can produce both
> J
>> codes and fully compiled executables.
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> Wow, is it April already?
> 
> 

-- 
Carlos E. Araya
---+ WebCT Administrator/Trainer
 P | California Virtual Campus
 - | C/O De Anza College
 G | 21250 Stevens Creek Blvd
---+ Cupertino, CA 95014

email   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
web http://www.cvc1.org/ (work)
http://www.silverwolf-net.net (personal)
phone   408 257 0420 (work)
PGP Fingerprint:E629 5DFD 7EAE 4995 E9D7  3D2F 5A9F 0CE7 DFE7 1756

Paradoxically, a refusal to 'put a monetary value on life' means that life
is often undervalued.
-- Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach




RE: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
From: Bob Leif,
To: James Richardson
I am dead serious. Evidently, you have had no experience with Ada 95.
Ada is much better at modeling XML than Java. I realize that Java is a
marketing success. Unfortunately, it is based to a great extent on
obsolete technology. For instance, it lacks: generics (templates),
enumerated types, and range checking. Ada is also safe enough for the
Boeing 777 flight control system and the French railroads.

-Original Message-
From: James Richardson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 9:38 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!

Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:

> 
> 
> From: Bob Leif,
> It seems that the Java underlying FOP is a source of a significant
> number of problems. I would suggest that the developers switch to a
much
> more reliable and efficient object oriented technology, Ada. Since Ada
> is an ISO standard and has an extensive validation suite, it is much
> more portable than Java. The GNAT (GNU) Ada compiler can produce both
J
> codes and fully compiled executables.
> 



Wow, is it April already?




Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread James Richardson
Robert C. Leif, Ph.D. wrote:

From: Bob Leif,
It seems that the Java underlying FOP is a source of a significant
number of problems. I would suggest that the developers switch to a much
more reliable and efficient object oriented technology, Ada. Since Ada
is an ISO standard and has an extensive validation suite, it is much
more portable than Java. The GNAT (GNU) Ada compiler can produce both J
codes and fully compiled executables.

Wow, is it April already?



RE: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
From: Bob Leif,
It seems that the Java underlying FOP is a source of a significant
number of problems. I would suggest that the developers switch to a much
more reliable and efficient object oriented technology, Ada. Since Ada
is an ISO standard and has an extensive validation suite, it is much
more portable than Java. The GNAT (GNU) Ada compiler can produce both J
codes and fully compiled executables.

-Original Message-
From: dav sem [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 6:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!

Hi,

another info:
Jaguar Server 3.6.1 use Sun/jdk1.2
and when I test Fop I use jdk1.3.1
This can be an answer?

DS.




>From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
>Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:47 +0100
>
>What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
>current versions. You may need to upgrade.
>
>On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> > The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB 
>Container). I
> > have successful set up the classpath
> > inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
> >
> > Driver driver = new Driver();
> >
> > I obtain this error result:
> >
> > java.lang.NullPointerException
> >at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
> >at
org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
> >at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
> >
> > Why??
> > Previously I have build a pure java application
> > that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
> >
> > HELP!!!1
> >
> > Tanks in advance
> >
> > Davide
>
>Cheers,
>Jeremias Märki
>
>mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>OUTLINE AG
>Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
>Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
>Internet http://www.outline.ch
>


_
Scarica GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer dall'indirizzo 
http://explorer.msn.it/intl.asp.



Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread dav sem
Hi Irina,
this is not (for me) a right answer,
in my project the EJB wrap a PURE Java class
that call Driver() constructor
Jaguar Server had a JVM (support Servlet etc ...)
Tanks
DS.

From: "Irina Grigorieva" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 17:35:51 +0300
Hi, maybe an answer is in the EJB's narrowing a subset of Java language can
be used:
for instance, in Java Beans you cannot use static member etc.
BR, Irina.
- Original Message -
From: "dav sem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
> Hi,
>
> another info:
> Jaguar Server 3.6.1 use Sun/jdk1.2
> and when I test Fop I use jdk1.3.1
> This can be an answer?
>
> DS.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:47 +0100
> >
> >What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
> >current versions. You may need to upgrade.
> >
> >On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> > > The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB
> >Container). I
> > > have successful set up the classpath
> > > inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
> > >
> > > Driver driver = new Driver();
> > >
> > > I obtain this error result:
> > >
> > > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > >at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
> > >at 
org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
> > >at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
> > >
> > > Why??
> > > Previously I have build a pure java application
> > > that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
> > >
> > > HELP!!!1
> > >
> > > Tanks in advance
> > >
> > > Davide
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Jeremias Märki
> >
> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >OUTLINE AG
> >Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
> >Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
> >Internet http://www.outline.ch
> >
>
>
> _
> Scarica GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer dall'indirizzo
> http://explorer.msn.it/intl.asp.
>
>


_
Prova MSN Messenger per conversare in linea con i tuoi amici: 
http://messenger.msn.it



Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread Irina Grigorieva
Hi, maybe an answer is in the EJB's narrowing a subset of Java language can
be used:
for instance, in Java Beans you cannot use static member etc.

BR, Irina.
- Original Message -
From: "dav sem" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2002 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!


> Hi,
>
> another info:
> Jaguar Server 3.6.1 use Sun/jdk1.2
> and when I test Fop I use jdk1.3.1
> This can be an answer?
>
> DS.
>
>
>
>
> >From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
> >Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:47 +0100
> >
> >What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
> >current versions. You may need to upgrade.
> >
> >On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> > > The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB
> >Container). I
> > > have successful set up the classpath
> > > inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
> > >
> > > Driver driver = new Driver();
> > >
> > > I obtain this error result:
> > >
> > > java.lang.NullPointerException
> > >at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
> > >at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
> > >at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
> > >
> > > Why??
> > > Previously I have build a pure java application
> > > that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
> > >
> > > HELP!!!1
> > >
> > > Tanks in advance
> > >
> > > Davide
> >
> >Cheers,
> >Jeremias Märki
> >
> >mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >OUTLINE AG
> >Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
> >Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
> >Internet http://www.outline.ch
> >
>
>
> _
> Scarica GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer dall'indirizzo
> http://explorer.msn.it/intl.asp.
>
>



Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread dav sem
Hi,
another info:
Jaguar Server 3.6.1 use Sun/jdk1.2
and when I test Fop I use jdk1.3.1
This can be an answer?
DS.


From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:47 +0100
What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
current versions. You may need to upgrade.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB 
Container). I
> have successful set up the classpath
> inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
>
> Driver driver = new Driver();
>
> I obtain this error result:
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
>
> Why??
> Previously I have build a pure java application
> that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
>
> HELP!!!1
>
> Tanks in advance
>
> Davide

Cheers,
Jeremias Märki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
Internet http://www.outline.ch

_
Scarica GRATUITAMENTE MSN Explorer dall'indirizzo 
http://explorer.msn.it/intl.asp.



Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread dav sem
Hi,
I use fop-0.20.1?
The last version is fop-0.20.2RC 
In this version there is Service Class!!
Tanks
DS.

From: Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: HELP DRIVER!
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 13:23:47 +0100
What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
current versions. You may need to upgrade.
On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB 
Container). I
> have successful set up the classpath
> inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
>
> Driver driver = new Driver();
>
> I obtain this error result:
>
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
>
> Why??
> Previously I have build a pure java application
> that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
>
> HELP!!!1
>
> Tanks in advance
>
> Davide

Cheers,
Jeremias Märki
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
Internet http://www.outline.ch

_
Prova MSN Messenger per conversare in linea con i tuoi amici: 
http://messenger.msn.it



Re: HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread Jeremias Maerki
What version do you use? As far as I know there's no Service class in
current versions. You may need to upgrade.

On Wed, 16 Jan 2002 08:51:59 + dav sem wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
> The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB Container). I 
> have successful set up the classpath
> inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->
> 
> Driver driver = new Driver();
> 
> I obtain this error result:
> 
> java.lang.NullPointerException
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
>at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
> 
> Why??
> Previously I have build a pure java application
> that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
> 
> HELP!!!1
> 
> Tanks in advance
> 
> Davide

Cheers,
Jeremias Märki

mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

OUTLINE AG
Postfach 3954 - Rhynauerstr. 15 - CH-6002 Luzern
Fon +41 (41) 317 2020 - Fax +41 (41) 317 2029
Internet http://www.outline.ch



HELP DRIVER!

2002-01-16 Thread dav sem
Hi,
I'm building EJB Component that perform a pdf document.
The EJB component is correctly installed in Jaguar Server (EJB Container). I 
have successful set up the classpath
inside Jaguar server and when I try to instantiate Driver ->

Driver driver = new Driver();
I obtain this error result:
java.lang.NullPointerException
  at org.apache.fop.apps.Service.providers(Driver.java:540)
  at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.setupDefaultMappings(Driver.java:258)
  at org.apache.fop.apps.Driver.(Driver.java:189)
Why??
Previously I have build a pure java application
that perform a pdf document and I haven't never received this!
HELP!!!1
Tanks in advance
Davide

_
MSN Photos è il metodo più semplice per condividere e stampare le tue foto: 
http://photos.msn.it/Support/WorldWide.aspx