RE: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-12 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
 -Original Message-
 From: J.Pietschmann [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]


Hi Joerg,

 Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
  Try specifying: keep-together=always on the table-rows.

 Using both keep-together=always and keep-with-next=always
 on all rows of a table longet than a page will send FOP into
 an infinite loop.

Just wondering: is this only the case when both properties have a value of
'always'? The OP seemed to be using a (low) integer value for
'keep-with-next', so I concluded --perhaps mistakenly so-- that there was no
risk of ending up with an infinite loop... since 'keep-together' would
always have higher priority than 'keep-with-next' (?)


Greetz,

Andreas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: RE: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-12 Thread Webmaster
!!!ATTENTION CE COURRIER N'EST PAS ARRIVE A DESTINATION!!!
Due a une très forte progression du SPAM sur notre boite aux lettres, nous vous 
prions de bien vouloir transférer votre courriel a notre nouvelle adresse: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Merci de votre compréhension
Alacuisine.Net
!!!ATTENTION CE COURRIER N'EST PAS ARRIVE A DESTINATION!!!



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-12 Thread J.Pietschmann
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Just wondering: is this only the case when both properties have a value of
'always'? The OP seemed to be using a (low) integer value for
'keep-with-next', so I concluded --perhaps mistakenly so-- that there was no
risk of ending up with an infinite loop... since 'keep-together' would
always have higher priority than 'keep-with-next' (?)
FOP 0.20.5 doesn't understand numerical priorities, I believe every
value (including never :-) is interpreted as always.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-11 Thread J.Pietschmann
Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
Try specifying: keep-together=always on the table-rows.
Using both keep-together=always and keep-with-next=always
on all rows of a table longet than a page will send FOP into
an infinite loop.
J.Pietschmann
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Re: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-10 Thread JBryant
From all that I have read (and tried myself), you've just hit FOP in its 
weakest spot. The only think I can suggest is to chunk your content such 
that a table never crosses a page boundary. Hopefully, the new effort on 
FOP (about which I know very little) will do better with keeps and breaks.

By the way, I love FOP for all that it lets me do, so I accept that it has 
a few limitations.

Jay Bryant
Bryant Communication Services



robert frapples [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
12/10/2004 11:50 AM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


To
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc

Subject
Breaking between rows before breaking rows






I have a bunch of tables, each with a bunch of rows, each with some
content.  I set keep-with-next='1' for each row, expecting it to
page break between tables, which it does. . .

for the most part.  If a single table is longer than one page, rather
than breaking between rows, it breaks in the middle of a row.

Can I keep rows together when possible and break between tables AND
not break in the middle of a row?  Is there some trick to do this?

-Stephen

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-10 Thread robert frapples
On Fri, 10 Dec 2004 13:25:44 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 From all that I have read (and tried myself), you've just hit FOP in its
 weakest spot. The only think I can suggest is to chunk your content such
 that a table never crosses a page boundary.

Thats what I was afraid of.  I really can't chunk my content in any
meaningful way as my input is generated from a dataplace somewhere
else by somebody else.  I suppose I could write some kind of template
to split text data up into lines and make each line a row.  If I use a
monospaced font I can count characters. . .this is not going to be
fun.

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



RE: Breaking between rows before breaking rows

2004-12-10 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
 -Original Message-
 From: robert frapples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

Hi,

 I have a bunch of tables, each with a bunch of rows, each with some
 content.  I set keep-with-next='1' for each row, expecting it to
 page break between tables, which it does. . .
 for the most part.  If a single table is longer than one page, rather
 than breaking between rows, it breaks in the middle of a row.

Try specifying: keep-together=always on the table-rows.

IIC:
- keep-with-* props define a relation between sibling FOs
- keep-together OTOH bears relevance to the FO descendants


HTH!

Greetz,

Andreas


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]