Re: Keeping it together
Lars Karschen wrote: ... I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page=always, but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something, since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;) You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic implementation of this property(-ies). Keeps doesn't work in FOP :( It is the most important feature to be implemented, from my point of view, anything else works good enough for my purposes. Regards, J.Ch. -- Ing. Jozef Chocholacek Qbizm Technologies, Inc. Chief Project Analyst ... the art of internet. Kralovopolska 139 tel: +420 5 4124 2414 601 12 Brno, CZ http://www.qbizm.com fax: +420 5 4121 2696
RE: Keeping it together
Supposedly in .20.3, fo:table-row keep-with-next=always works. In previous versions it went into an endless loop if the rows went beyond the end of the page. Has anyone used .20.3? I didn't like the the logging errors and two new jar files I was supposed to use. And I missed my benchmarking output (the time not the memory). I posted on fop-dev to ask if there was any way around these issues but no one replied. -Matt -Original Message- From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Keeping it together Lars Karschen wrote: ... I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page=always, but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something, since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;) You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic implementation of this property(-ies). Keeps doesn't work in FOP :( It is the most important feature to be implemented, from my point of view, anything else works good enough for my purposes. Regards, J.Ch. -- Ing. Jozef Chocholacek Qbizm Technologies, Inc. Chief Project Analyst ... the art of internet. Kralovopolska 139 tel: +420 5 4124 2414 601 12 Brno, CZ http://www.qbizm.com fax: +420 5 4121 2696
RE: Keeping it together
You can get the debugging output back by asking for DEBUG output in the logging code. Scott -Original Message- From: Savino, Matt C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 11:46 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: Keeping it together Supposedly in .20.3, fo:table-row keep-with-next=always works. In previous versions it went into an endless loop if the rows went beyond the end of the page. Has anyone used .20.3? I didn't like the the logging errors and two new jar files I was supposed to use. And I missed my benchmarking output (the time not the memory). I posted on fop-dev to ask if there was any way around these issues but no one replied. -Matt -Original Message- From: Jozef Chocholacek [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2002 11:12 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Keeping it together Lars Karschen wrote: ... I tried to connect them via keep-with-next.within-page=always, but there's no change on the output, maybe i overlooked something, since i'm not sure if i understand the definition on the W3C-Page ;) You understand it good, but FOP has no or just a symbolic implementation of this property(-ies). Keeps doesn't work in FOP :( It is the most important feature to be implemented, from my point of view, anything else works good enough for my purposes. Regards, J.Ch. -- Ing. Jozef Chocholacek Qbizm Technologies, Inc. Chief Project Analyst ... the art of internet. Kralovopolska 139 tel: +420 5 4124 2414 601 12 Brno, CZ http://www.qbizm.com fax: +420 5 4121 2696
