Re: Lock generated PDF was Re: Security on FOP

2002-02-06 Thread Keiron Liddle
On 2002.02.05 16:15 ewitness - Ben Fowler wrote: Yes. I am not sure that I will get started full before the end of February, but I intend to contribute to 1. Java 1.1.8 version 2. keep-with 3. Encryption Keeping jdk1.1 support is a hinderance to the development of FOP and as

Re: Lock generated PDF was Re: Security on FOP

2002-02-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
> >Do I hear you volunteering to write the code to do it? > Yes. I am not sure that I will get started full before the end of > February, but I intend to contribute to Cool. > 1. Java 1.1.8 version Last september it has been decided to drop JDK 1.1 support mostly out of performance reaso

Re: Lock generated PDF was Re: Security on FOP

2002-02-05 Thread ewitness - Ben Fowler
At 6:08 am -0800 5/2/02, Carlos Araya wrote: On 02/05/02 3:08, "ewitness - Ben Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My understanding is that is is possible to both digitally sign and encrypt PDF files. Using Acrobat you can do that and a lot more. However I don't think that's what Fop was designe

Re: Lock generated PDF was Re: Security on FOP

2002-02-05 Thread Carlos Araya
On 02/05/02 3:08, "ewitness - Ben Fowler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I have a question: >>> with FOP, Is possible to lock with a password >>> the PDF Document generated??? >> >> No. >> >> [ snip ] >> You will have to do some post-processing with other software. > > Is this something that is