Fop-users,
My apologies. I wasn't watching when I posted this to fop-user.
Peter
Cyril Rognon wrote:
Hi all,
I think this thread would be more usefull on the dev list, but since
it's here already...
Hi all,
I think this thread would be more usefull on the dev list, but since it's
here already...
Usually, use of static classes can mess with server environnement that are
able to elegantly restart themselves without shutting down the JVM they use.
If classes are not taken off memory, values h
Jeremias,
Pardon my ignorance, but could you sketch out the nature of the problem
for me?
I ask in particular because the current situation is dirty. There is a
lot of talk going on about the plumbing, which is generally over my
head, but, in the short term I would like to see the Options
rat
> So I can call options once (at application start) and it will affect all
> transformations thereafter?
> That's nice, as I think I was calling this every transformation.
Right. Not that I find this overly nice, because using statics can be A
Bad Thing (TM) in server environments. We're going to
So I can call options once (at application start) and it will affect all
transformations thereafter?
That's nice, as I think I was calling this every transformation.
Brian
On Wed, 27 February 2002, Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>
> > I saw the code pieces on the metioned website but I did not understa
> I saw the code pieces on the metioned website but I did not understand ist:
>
> Having the driver-object defined in the first box on the site and the
> option -object from the third box, how can I plug the option to the driver?
Well, the documentation might be misleading. You don't have to plug
.)
Software Developer
Tel.: ++49-711/28 43 28-1
Fax: ++49-711/28 43 28-2
Mobil: 0160/4 40 93 55
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeremias Maerki [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 7:50 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Options
>
>
> Look
Look here on how to apply the userconfig file:
http://xml.apache.org/fop/embedding.html
And as for the second question: PDFRenderer, for example, does not
use the setOptions()-facility at the moment.
> I create a DOM-Tree dynamically and put it together with a XSL-file to get a
> PDF.
>
> But no
