Thaks for your quick reply Andreas,
I have created a reduced version of the original WordML document with the
same continous section break, and obtained the same results (it breaks it in
two different pages).
Here you have the FO I'm currently using.
It's long.
ready?
Drats. I played with the fo after attaching it and before sending. The
commented-out region-before lines are the ones which cause the problem.
On 07/14/2011 09:51 PM, Rob Sargent wrote:
Call off the hounds, I've found the root cause. I still think it's
quite interesting how the two version
On 12/07/2011 12:11, Glenn Adams wrote:
this is not a bug, as pointed out by Pascal
By debug I meant debug the XSLT/XSL-FO rather than the Java code.
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 5:08 AM, Chris Bowditch
bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com mailto:bowditch_ch...@hotmail.com wrote:
On 12/07/2011
I get this error intermittently while generating PDF report using FOP 1.0.
null:5511:928: {http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format}block; is not a valid
child of fo:table-row! (See position 5511:928). In most cases this issue
is resolved on resubmitting the report. Can any one pin point what is the
On 15 Jul 2011, at 09:26, Marcos García wrote:
Hi Marcos
I have created a reduced version of the original WordML document with the
same continous section break, and obtained the same results (it breaks it in
two different pages).
Here you have the FO I'm currently using.
It's long.
On 15 Jul 2011, at 17:54, Hamed Mohammed wrote:
Hi
Just to get it out of the way: please refrain from hijacking existing threads
in the future, unless it really is the same issue. The OP was about
fo:list-blocks, your issue concerns fo:table-rows. The OP was about missing
child elements,
See [1]. Valid children of table-row are table-cell+.
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xsl11-20061205/#fo_table-row
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Hamed Mohammed
mohdhamedms...@gmail.comwrote:
I get this error intermittently while generating PDF report using FOP 1.0.
null:5511:928:
On 15 Jul 2011, at 15:57, Rob Sargent wrote:
Hi Rob
Drats. I played with the fo after attaching it and before sending. The
commented-out region-before lines are the ones which cause the problem.
Sorry, but which commented lines are you referring to? I do not see any in the
posted
No the commented lines are in the fo I attached to message previous to
the drats. The issue is resolved though I think the difference in the
behaviour between the two revs is ,um, er, spectacular. ;)
On 07/15/2011 01:44 PM, Andreas L. Delmelle wrote:
On 15 Jul 2011, at 15:57, Rob Sargent wrote:
I don't know if this is the case, but I had similar problem (a region
with left side of the content hidden on the left side only on FOP 1.0
while FOP 0.95 worked correctly) and I discovered that was related to
a bug in hidden property of regions in FOP 1.0.
BTW, my XML editor show that the attached fo is not valid, due to the
margin- properties (as stated by Rob) and due to the cell content
(table-cell cannot have text content, only element allowed)...
--
Giuseppe Briotti
g.brio...@gmail.com
Alme Sol, curru nitido diem qui
promis et celas aliusque
11 matches
Mail list logo
