Re: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Warren Young
On 5/21/2012 6:49 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: do you have any specific features you're interested in? I only use XSL-FO via DocBook and the standard stylesheets, so I'm at two removes from XSL-FO itself. I've noticed that RenderX XEP output usually looks nicer than FOP output. One would have

Re: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Glenn Adams
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:42 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: On 5/21/2012 6:49 PM, Glenn Adams wrote: do you have any specific features you're interested in? I only use XSL-FO via DocBook and the standard stylesheets, so I'm at two removes from XSL-FO itself. I've noticed that

RE: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Hintz, David
We use Apache FOP 1.0 for writer drafts only. The main (possibly only) feature preventing us from using it for production (customer deliverables) is the lack of indexing support. Consequently, we use an expensive PDF generation tool for customer deliverables. Any chance that indexing will be

Re: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Glenn Adams
I presume you are referring to the features defined at [1]. [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xsl/#d0e13293 The answer to question is NO, there is no activity (of which I'm aware) to implement the features defined in XSL-FO 1.1 Section 6.10. It would be useful for you to file a bug [2], with severity

table of contents page number not showing in RTF output

2012-05-23 Thread Chen Yang
Hey guys, I am converting xml to rtf using fop trunk ver. page numbers (table of content to be exact) showing up as # symbol but field codes are correct, if I print the document, Word will display the numbers, what is it that I need to do to display the numbers immediately? example:

Re: table of contents page number not showing in RTF output

2012-05-23 Thread Glenn Adams
what do you mean by Word will display the numbers? On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Chen Yang cy...@hrsg.ca wrote: Hey guys, I am converting xml to rtf using fop trunk ver. page numbers (table of content to be exact) showing up as # symbol but field codes are correct, if I print the

Re: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Warren Young
for. perhaps you can look more closely at the differences that lead you to this impression, and give us some concrete input on what you find Here's a pretty good example of what I mean: http://etr-usa.com/fop/titles-admin-20120523-1511.fo http://etr-usa.com/fop/titles-admin-20120523-1511

Re: Information about Apache FOP

2012-05-23 Thread Glenn Adams
Thanks, this is a useful comparison. I can clearly see a number of differences, such as kerning and word spacing, which I need to investigate further. So stay tuned. On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote: http://etr-usa.com/fop/titles-**admin-20120523-1511