tandard is very clear about the absolute
position of e.g. the address information to display in the window of the
envelope or the folding marks, I decided to use block-container absolute
positioning for these items.
Thus, I tried to make up a very basic stylesheet that contains the
folding mark
n to display in the window of the
> envelope or the folding marks, I decided to use block-container absolute
> positioning for these items.
>
> Thus, I tried to make up a very basic stylesheet that contains the
> folding marks at 105mm, 148,5mm and 210mm from top. Also, I included
absolute
positioning for these items.
Thus, I tried to make up a very basic stylesheet that contains the
folding marks at 105mm, 148,5mm and 210mm from top. Also, I included the
window for the address which is positioned at 20mm from the left and
45mm from top.
The curious thing about the
with FOP?
>
> I need to absolutely position text on the pdf ontop of a background
> image with any library I can consider as a replacement for Itext. I am
> using the PDFContentByte in Itext to do this absolute positioning.
You want to use an absolutely-positioned block-cont
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Cc: Amit Bhasin (MEL)
Betreff: Absolute positioning and images
Hi -
Am investigating FOP as an alternative to our current PDF solution, Itext.
I have done some research but cannot see from the FAQ etc and googling
Can I absolutely position (to pixel positions) text
image with any library I can consider as a replacement for Itext. I am
using the PDFContentByte in Itext to do this absolute positioning.
Thanks in advance
Andrew
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient, please delete it from your system, do
Hi all
We've got a FOP engine mainly used to produce PDF files. Now, output to RTF
is also desired. Most formatting is good, but absolutely positioned block
containers don't work.
I've read some posts stating that RTF does support absolute positioning, but
only for the current
>From: Daniel Noll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Hi Daniel,
>> I think I've found a fix for this bug, but since I'm not 100% --how
>> fitting :-)-- certain, could you compare the FO and check the PDF result
>> in Bugzilla 41894, and see if that matches the expectation?
>
>It works now! Thankyou.
I think I've found a fix for this bug, but since I'm not 100% --how
fitting :-)-- certain, could you compare the FO and check the PDF result
in Bugzilla 41894, and see if that matches the expectation?
It works now! Thankyou. :-)
I even tested it on a really awful example, an HTML file spat o
On Mar 19, 2007, at 18:29, Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
Daniel,
Posting this here because Bugzilla did not accept your address in the
cc: list.
So now the 1, 2 and 3 are all inside the outer box, but all at
the top left corner. This could be because the inside
the top-level doesn't fi
On Mar 19, 2007, at 10:02, Chris Bowditch wrote:
Hi Daniel / Chris,
bidi="embed">
top="16.0%">
1fo:inline>
So now the 1, 2 and 3 are all inside the outer box, but all at the
top left corner. This could be because the inside the
top-level doe
Daniel Noll wrote:
top="16.0%">
1
So now the 1, 2 and 3 are all inside the outer box, but all at the top
left corner. This could be because the inside the top-level
doesn't fill the entire block container. It could
also be because % simply
In that case, if you want to make further use of that library, it's
probably best to file a bug with CSS2XSLFO as it generates FO of a
dubious quality.
I somehow doubt there's an XSL-FO implementation that renders the sample
you supplied 'as expected'. The author(s) of CSS2XSLFO probably nev
Can you post up the revised FO? Just placing a block container around the
inline isn't enough. The attributes relating to absolute position have to
be moved off thye fo:inline element and onto the fo:block-container
element.
It now looks like... (this is actually a slightly different example,
On Mar 15, 2007, at 23:03, Daniel Noll wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Well in actual fact, it isn't "me" using percentages or fo:inline,
as it's coming out of someone else's library. :-)
In that case, if you want to make further use of that library, it's
probably best to file a bug with CSS2XSLFO as
Daniel Noll wrote:
Well in actual fact, it isn't "me" using percentages or fo:inline, as
it's coming out of someone else's library. :-)
The best I can hope to do is contain things in blocks if they can't
handle the absolute positioning themselves, by using XSL
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Bowditch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 9:02 PM
Subject: Re: Absolute positioning
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 02:28, Daniel Noll wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see from the compliance page that abso
Andreas L Delmelle wrote:
On Mar 15, 2007, at 02:28, Daniel Noll wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see from the compliance page that absolute positioning is
implemented. However in practice I have an FO file which uses
absolute positioning and it seems like it doesn't take effect at all.
I culle
On Mar 15, 2007, at 02:28, Daniel Noll wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I see from the compliance page that absolute positioning is
implemented. However in practice I have an FO file which uses
absolute positioning and it seems like it doesn't take effect at all.
I culled all the containing ele
I wrote:
I culled all the containing elements from my FO output just in case they
were to blame somehow, and the issue still occurred. Here's the block
(apologies in advance for the way this is going to break):
BTW, I'd culled out the , but it didn't help to have it
there either (same render
I see from the compliance page that absolute positioning is implemented.
However in practice I have an FO file which uses absolute positioning and it
seems like it doesn't take effect at all.
I culled all the containing elements from my FO output just in case they
were to blame somehow
21 matches
Mail list logo
