This sounds very nice :-)
Dirk
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Good news then: CMYK and Pantone support has recently appeared on my
planning radar for FOP.
On 31.08.2006 18:37:08 Dirk Bromberg wrote:
Yes,
our dynamic tool is embedded in a customer application, so by using fop
for this part ther
Good news then: CMYK and Pantone support has recently appeared on my
planning radar for FOP.
On 31.08.2006 18:37:08 Dirk Bromberg wrote:
> Yes,
>
> our dynamic tool is embedded in a customer application, so by using fop
> for this part there a no costs per unit. And for the highres "print"
> th
Yes,
our dynamic tool is embedded in a customer application, so by using fop
for this part there a no costs per unit. And for the highres "print"
there are a few xep users which can create the printable output.
Dirk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Thanks for the response. Is there a reason you s
Thanks for the response. Is there a reason you still do your dynamic documents
in FOP rather than XEP?
Andy R
--
This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] at openSubscriber.com
http://www.opensubscriber.com/message/fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org/4794903.html
---
schrieb:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:24 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Commercial Processors
Is there any information available on how comparable fop is
in relation to commercial processors.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 29, 2006 2:24 PM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: Commercial Processors
>
> Is there any information available on how comparable fop is
> i
Is there any information available on how comparable fop is in relation to
commercial processors.
Has anyone switched from one to the other?
thanks as always
Andyr
--
This message was sent on behalf of [EMAIL PROTECTED] at openSubscriber.com
http://www.opensubscriber.com/messages/fop-users
