Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-21 Thread Markus Ruggiero
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: PDF version specification Hi Markus, Unfortunately looking at the code, the PDF version (1.4) is hard-coded. This is presumably because FOP doesn't support any of the features of subsequent versions, though I'm sure someone in the community

PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Markus Ruggiero
When I generate a simple PDF from within my Java app the resulting PDF file says PDF Version 1.4. My customer talks about going to PDF version 1.6 or higher. Is this something I have to explicitly set? Where would I do this? My tests are based on FOP 1.0 and the simple embedding examples from

Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread mehdi houshmand
Hi Markus, Unfortunately looking at the code, the PDF version (1.4) is hard-coded. This is presumably because FOP doesn't support any of the features of subsequent versions, though I'm sure someone in the community will be able to tell you the exact reasons for this. You may be able to change

RE: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Eric Douglas
@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: PDF version specification Hi Markus, Unfortunately looking at the code, the PDF version (1.4) is hard-coded. This is presumably because FOP doesn't support any of the features of subsequent versions, though I'm sure someone in the community will be able to tell you the exact

Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Glenn Adams
adds a feature you need. -Original Message- From: mehdi houshmand [mailto:med1...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 10:10 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: PDF version specification Hi Markus, Unfortunately looking at the code, the PDF version (1.4

Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Andreas Delmelle
On 14 Mar 2011, at 19:09, Glenn Adams wrote: I've been working in the background on a patch that adds support for using newer PDF features, including page transitions and option groups, and in this work defined an new element in the FOP CONF file as follows to specify the PDF output

Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Zac Nichol
Hi. I'm very new to FOP and xml-fo. I want to flow data into 2 different regions (region-body and region-before). is this possible? when i do it, FOP complains that For fo:page-sequence, only one fo:flow may be declared. It seems weird to me that you can have many fo:static-content objects

Re: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Zac Nichol
woops this should have been a new thread and not a reply to Markus. sorry for the confusion :P On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Zac Nichol zacnic...@gmail.com wrote: Hi. I'm very new to FOP and xml-fo. I want to flow data into 2 different regions (region-body and region-before).  is this

RE: PDF version specification

2011-03-14 Thread Eric Douglas
want it somewhere else you can always hardcode absolute positions like I do. -Original Message- From: Zac Nichol [mailto:zacnic...@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 14, 2011 2:48 PM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: PDF version specification Hi. I'm very new to FOP and xml