PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11858871
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
nancy_b wrote:
It increases space between the numbers and list body, but the warnings are
still present. May be I need certain values to hide them?
The warning occurs because there is not enough space for the
list item label. I'm not sure what effect the xsl:param
name=orderedlist.label.width
nancy_b wrote:
Yeap, exactly what I suggested: the problem is with list numbering starting
after 10 (including 10). No space between number and list body. Please
advise!
You need to adjust either provisional-distance-between-starts and/or
provisional-label-separation to give your labels
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11805695
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11813901
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm glad it helped. It's not so much FOP that considers TOC's as tables,
it's the Docobook XSL stylesheets that use tables to render them. As far
as I know they don't usually generate warning messages with FOP. By the
way, are you using the fop1.extentions parameter?
-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11810274
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
)
Is this a FOP bug?
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11779090
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Patrick Paul wrote:
Hi Nancy,
I do not believe this is an FOP bug. Could you tell us what version of
FOP you are using?
Ok I just read in another thread that you use FOP 0.93 so you really
shouldn't have this error message if your FO is right.
As well try to run then .fo I have included
Hi Nancy,
I do not believe this is an FOP bug. Could you tell us what version of
FOP you are using?
As well try to run then .fo I have included at the end of this message.
It uses proportional-column-width and I have no problems with FOP 0.93.
Let us know if it works.
Patrick
nancy_b wrote:
The default width for tables is 100%. I just used 100mm as an example
here. In any case it's better to specify the width even if you put
width=100% otherwise FOP will give you an INFO message indicating that
it is assuming width=100%
Cheers,
Patrick
nancy_b wrote:
Hi dear Patrick!
I use the
this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11783261
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
Nancy,
I am getting a little confused about what you are doing exactly. If you
are getting the warning message you quoted in the other thread then it
is a problem with the column-width you specified (or failed to specify)
for your columns. As far as I know there is no colwidth property in XSL-FO.
]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11784906
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/specifying-column-width-for-tables-tf4140979.html#a11784935
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Bob Stayton is absolutely right in the Docbook context. In XSL-FO
however these are translated into column-width properties.
Patrick
nancy_b wrote:
Hi dear Patrick,
That's what Bob Stayton writes:
Here is how you specify column width values:
'colwidth' specifies the desired width
We are really getting off-topic for this list... This is more of a
Docbook issue.
I took a look and here is the explanation: when you specify
colwidth=1* in Docbook, the resulting FO is something like
fo:table-column column-number=1 /. As you can see there is no
column-width defined here. However
17 matches
Mail list logo
