Hugues Leonardi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> With this fo file (http://leohome.free.fr/FOP/table_test/table_test.fo)
> and the latest fop trunk, it is possible to reproduce what I say.
> Here is the pdf file :
> http://leohome.free.fr/FOP/table_test/table_test.pdf
> It's OK with FOP 0.93 and with FOP 0.94.
Vincent Hennebert a écrit :
Hi Sylvain,
Sorry, FOP 0.20.5 is no longer supported. I for myself don’t even have
the necessary knowledge of the 0.20.5 code to be able to help you...
I’d strongly suggest you to upgrade to the latest 0.94 version, even if
there is no Debian package available for
Ok, thanks for the tips. I will try to help constructively.
Jerven
On 12/17/07, Jeremias Maerki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17.12.2007 13:12:33 Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Are you sure? as the same effect does not seem to occur when using the
> > seperate option on border-collapse.
On 17.12.2007 13:12:33 Jerven Bolleman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are you sure? as the same effect does not seem to occur when using the
> seperate option on border-collapse.
Yes. The border painting code is the same for both cases.
> See the attached bug.xsl and compare with the previous one. In the new
Hi,
Are you sure? as the same effect does not seem to occur when using the
seperate option on border-collapse.
See the attached bug.xsl and compare with the previous one. In the new
case there are 2 separate lines 0.1mm each while in the original
sample there where collapsed lines 0.2 mm wide.
I
No, that's not the problem. The cell background is painted and then cell
borders are painted next (i.e. "over" them). The problem is rather
subpixel effects. Lines can become smaller than one device pixel and can
therefore disappear (worst case). At any rate, FOP makes the lines
exactly as wide as
Several ways are possible. You have to find out what fits your needs
best:
- add a keep-together on the table-row
- Set widows/orphans to "1"
- try widow/orphan-content-limit (see [1])
[1]
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/extensions.html#widow-orphan-content-limit
However, this shouldn't r
Hi Akagi,
Akagi Kobayashi wrote:
> We are using FOP 0.93 and find that when a cell in a table straddles across
> two pages, the text (especially if it is a long one) does not appear on the
> first page.
> Illustration below - thanks to Sylvain Ferlac - the cell on the left is the
> offending one.
Hi Sylvain,
Sorry, FOP 0.20.5 is no longer supported. I for myself don’t even have
the necessary knowledge of the 0.20.5 code to be able to help you...
I’d strongly suggest you to upgrade to the latest 0.94 version, even if
there is no Debian package available for it. Moreover I would be
inter
We are using FOP 0.93 and find that when a cell in a table straddles across
two pages, the text (especially if it is a long one) does not appear on the
first page.
Illustration below - thanks to Sylvain Ferlac - the cell on the left is the
offending one. How can this be fixed?
PAGE 1
Hi,
What you need here is keep-together with integer value.
Unfortunately, this is not yet implemented in FOP.
(see
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/compliance.html#fo-property-keep-together)
As a workaround, you can set the property when the estimated size of the row
doesn't exceed a given va
Hi,
can you provide a short XSLFO file (not XSLT) that demonstrates what you
describe?
Did you experiment this with FOP 0.94 or FOR Trunk?
Pascal
> -Message d'origine-
> De : HLeonardi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Envoyé : dimanche 16 décembre 2007 14:44
>
> Hello fop community,
>
> I
12 matches
Mail list logo