Hi Chris,
Christopher R. Maden wrote:
I have a multi-page document which is one large table. I previously
produced this document with FOP 0.20.5, and have recently switched to
0.94.
The table has multiple fo:table-body elements in it. With 0.20.5, it
paginated rather neatly, filling a
Even though FOP configuration is quite well documented
(http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.94/configuration.html), I think there is a need for
a FOP configuration tool. It would help new users get up and running quickly and allow existing
users to easily manage their existing configurations.
FWIW
In general and personally I only have 'problems' getting font
configuration right. Although latest fop changes have alleviated much
of the trouble it still can be a hassle to find out why a certain font
is not picked up.
I guess 'fop font' configuration (and verification)
Hello,
I got a problem with linefeed-treatment='preserve' and hyphenation:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=iso-8859-1?
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
fo:layout-master-set
fo:simple-page-master master-name=simple
fo:region-body/
/fo:simple-page-master
Hello,
we switched recently from fop 0.20.5 to 0.94. Now there appears to be a
problem with jars containing an INDEX.LIST. Is there a known problem
with the usage of the jar -i command?
We use quite a number of jar-files (around 300 - 350) so using an
INDEX.LIST improves the startup-time of our
Hello,
we switched recently from fop 0.20.5 to 0.94. Now there appears to be a
problem with jars containing an INDEX.LIST. Is there a known problem
with the usage of the jar -i command?
We use quite a number of jar-files (around 300 - 350) so using an
INDEX.LIST improves the startup-time of our
Dirk Eiden wrote:
Hello,
I got a problem with linefeed-treatment='preserve' and hyphenation:
This is a known bug. See:
https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38264
snip/
Chris
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
By default, FOP embeds every TrueType font as a CID subset, even in 0.94.
But as Justus already mentioned there have been bugfixes since then
which should improve the situation (namely problems with PDF viewers
other than Acrobat Reader). So if pdffonts indicates that
