Hi Andreas,
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Inviato: mercoledì 24 giugno 2009 17.47
A: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Oggetto: Re: AW: AW: AW: Another alignment thing, maybe related to [Bug
47380]
If you want to try this out
On 25 Jun 2009, at 09:45, Laera Dario wrote:
Hi Dario
-Messaggio originale-
Da: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
If you want to try this out, and succeed in getting it to work, don't
forget to send us the patch. ;-)
If not, again, I'll probably have a closer look
Hi Andreas,
Still another thing: the same table of contents that showed the earlier
reported errors still showed on error: When running the fo-file from my
application, the fo:page-number-citation element was left aligned, although the
fo (snippet below) clearly said text-align=right. I ran
On 24 Jun 2009, at 15:34, Georg Datterl wrote:
Hi Georg
snip /
Maybe that's helpfull.
Definitely! I just looked at the code for
org.apache.fop.area.inline.UnresolvedPageNumber, and the issue is that
those areas are serializable, but the Font instance member is
explicitly declared as
GmbH: www.willmycc.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 16:38
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: Another alignment thing, maybe related to [Bug 47380]
On 24 Jun 2009
: www.willmycc.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 17:16
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: Another alignment thing, maybe related to [Bug 47380]
On 24 Jun 2009, at 16:43, Georg Datterl
On 24 Jun 2009, at 17:23, Georg Datterl wrote:
Pity. But proves again: For every problem there's a simple, obvious
and wrong solution.
:-)
I think the real solution would be to store the referenced FontTriplet
in the UnresolvedPageNumber, instead of the Font instance.
FontTriplets are
: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 24. Juni 2009 17:47
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: Another alignment thing, maybe related to [Bug 47380]
On 24 Jun 2009, at 17:23, Georg Datterl wrote:
Pity. But proves again: For every problem
On 24 Jun 2009, at 18:15, Georg Datterl wrote:
[Me: ]
[BTW (slightly off-topic for this particular thread): I'm
wondering whether we do not need /all/ applicable font-
families. After all, page- numbers can be formatted, so
the eventual font would have to have all the necessary
glyphs. Right
Hi Andreas,
since you already had a look at the bug, maybe this is related:
?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
!-- edited with XMLSpy v2006 sp1 U (http://www.altova.com) by Joerg Geyer
(Geneon media solutions gmbh) --
fo:root xmlns:fo=http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Format;
On 18 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Georg Datterl wrote:
Hi Georg
since you already had a look at the bug, maybe this is related:
snip /
The flow contains two nearly identical blocks, only the first block
contains an additional empty inline. In the result, I'd not expect
the inline to result in
Nachricht-
Von: Andreas Delmelle [mailto:andreas.delme...@telenet.be]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Juni 2009 12:19
An: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Another alignment thing, maybe related to [Bug 47380]
On 18 Jun 2009, at 12:00, Georg Datterl wrote:
Hi Georg
since you already had
On 18 Jun 2009, at 12:26, Georg Datterl wrote:
Hi Georg
Latest version. Just checked, no updates in svn since yesterday.
What I feared... ;-)
That means I have /some/ local change(s) that would solve the issue.
Only I have no idea at the moment /where/ precisely. I'm almost done
with a
13 matches
Mail list logo
