Re: FOP and Avalon

2016-08-15 Thread jdebinder
Thanks Glenn, it may come to that. -- View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302p44309.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e

Re: FOP and Avalon

2016-08-12 Thread Glenn Adams
ted. Since FOP depends on Avalon we will also have to > remove our dependency on FOP and try to find something to replace it. > > Is there any more thought to removing the dependency on the Avalon > framework? > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://apache-fop

FOP and Avalon

2016-08-12 Thread jdebinder
? -- View this message in context: http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302.html Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr

Re: FOP and Avalon

2007-07-23 Thread Adrian Cumiskey
Hi Javier, The Avalon dependencies are minimal in the latest trunk build (and the forth coming 0.94 release). FOP uses Apache Commons logging which allows you to chose which ever logging implementation you desire. The old configuration dependencies are now minimal, I abstracted all that cod

FOP and Avalon

2007-07-23 Thread Javier Salado
plan ahead all the details of the support issues. Thanks for the help and best regards, J. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tf4129121.html#a11742030 Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com

Re: FOP and Avalon

2005-07-08 Thread Chris Bowditch
Welcome back from the wildnerness :-) Jeremias Maerki wrote: On 05.07.2005 16:48:57 Chris Bowditch wrote: Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in the development version. However, there are some pieces of code that still require avalon. I'm not sure how

Re: FOP and Avalon

2005-07-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 05.07.2005 16:48:57 Chris Bowditch wrote: > Wiström wrote: > > > > >1. Is there any plan on removing the dependency to Avalon on later > > versions on FOP? > > Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in > the development version. However, there

Re: FOP and Avalon

2005-07-07 Thread Jeremias Maerki
On 05.07.2005 16:33:41 Wiström, Magnus wrote: > We have developed a system which uses FOP for generating PDF's. This > works just fine and there is no issue with the functionality. > However, our code has been under the scrutiny of a code review and from > that a concern has been highlighted that

Re: FOP and Avalon

2005-07-05 Thread Chris Bowditch
Wiström wrote: 1. Is there any plan on removing the dependency to Avalon on later versions on FOP? Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in the development version. However, there are some pieces of code that still require avalon. I'm not sure

FOP and Avalon

2005-07-05 Thread Wiström , Magnus
Hi,   We have developed a system which uses FOP for generating PDF's. This works just fine and there is no issue with the functionality. However, our code has been under the scrutiny of a code review and from that a concern has been highlighted that we are using FOP which is dependent on the a