Thanks Glenn, it may come to that.
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302p44309.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e
ted. Since FOP depends on Avalon we will also have to
> remove our dependency on FOP and try to find something to replace it.
>
> Is there any more thought to removing the dependency on the Avalon
> framework?
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://apache-fop
?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-fop.1065347.n5.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tp44302.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr
Hi Javier,
The Avalon dependencies are minimal in the latest trunk build (and the
forth coming 0.94 release). FOP uses Apache Commons logging which
allows you to chose which ever logging implementation you desire. The
old configuration dependencies are now minimal, I abstracted all that
cod
plan ahead all the details of the
support issues.
Thanks for the help and best regards,
J.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/FOP-and-Avalon-tf4129121.html#a11742030
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Welcome back from the wildnerness :-)
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
On 05.07.2005 16:48:57 Chris Bowditch wrote:
Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in
the development version. However, there are some pieces of code that still
require avalon. I'm not sure how
On 05.07.2005 16:48:57 Chris Bowditch wrote:
> Wiström wrote:
>
>
>
> >1. Is there any plan on removing the dependency to Avalon on later
> > versions on FOP?
>
> Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in
> the development version. However, there
On 05.07.2005 16:33:41 Wiström, Magnus wrote:
> We have developed a system which uses FOP for generating PDF's. This
> works just fine and there is no issue with the functionality.
> However, our code has been under the scrutiny of a code review and from
> that a concern has been highlighted that
Wiström wrote:
1. Is there any plan on removing the dependency to Avalon on later
versions on FOP?
Yes, the logging part of avalon has been replaced by Apache Common Logging in
the development version. However, there are some pieces of code that still
require avalon. I'm not sure
Hi,
We have developed a system which
uses FOP for generating PDF's. This works just fine and there is no issue with
the functionality.
However, our code has been under the
scrutiny of a code review and from that a concern has been highlighted that we
are using FOP which is dependent on the a
10 matches
Mail list logo