RE: Chemical Markup Language

2006-03-13 Thread cknell
I've just had a look at CML. What a nightmare! Take this element, for example, CML.TAB ID=table1 NAME=NET ATOMIC CHARGES ROWS= 12 COLUMNS=3 COL.NAMES=ELEMENT CHARGE DENSITY COL.REFS=CML.COR.NOTATION CML.THE.CHARGE CML.THE.AEDENSITY COL.TYPES=STRING FLOAT FLOAT C -0.102123

Re: Chemical Markup Language

2006-03-13 Thread Louis . Masters
bala: If you are already using XML, the easiest thing (IMO) to do would be to use XSL to convert your source format to CML. I do this for a variety of different outputs and it works great and is very scalable and easy to maintain. With that said, this is more of an XSL question so you may want

Re: Chemical Markup Language

2006-03-13 Thread David Delbecq
My day chasing deadlocks suddently feel better compared to this. I have never seen a worse design of a markup language :) The designer should be dismembered, stripped, tied up, covered with cow blood and exposed in stonehenge to be raped by aliens. By that time his/her computer should be burn

RE: Chemical Markup Language

2006-03-13 Thread Robert Leif
PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, March 13, 2006 6:10 AM To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org Subject: Re: Chemical Markup Language My day chasing deadlocks suddently feel better compared to this. I have never seen a worse design of a markup language :) The designer should be dismembered, stripped, tied up