Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-09 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hiren sent me an AFP sample off-list. I know now what's causing the
effect: A Map Image Object uses "scale to fill" instead "replicate and
trim". The 8x8 dither pattern gets streched to the background area and
is not replicated. How that got in there, I have no idea.

org.apache.fop.afp.AFPDitheredRectanglePainter.paint(PaintingInfo)
clearly uses "replicate and trim" since the beginning. I can only
explain it with someone changing the source code. Hiren, did you modify
your FOP version?
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/afp/AFPDitheredRectanglePainter.java?view=log

On 04.02.2011 13:48:32 Jeremias Maerki wrote:
> Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
> and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
> by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
> In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
> checked with Compart DocBridgeView, IBM Workbench, BTB Browser and ISIS
> Papyrus AFP Viewer.
> 
> Which FOP version are you using? You can send me a sample AFP file
> off-list and I'll check if I see anything wrong.
> 
> On 04.02.2011 11:25:21 hirenshah wrote:
> > 
> > Thanks!  Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> > > 
> > > I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
> > > something on Wednesday.
> > > 
> > > On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
> > >> 
> > >> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the
> > >> output
> > >> looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
> > >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png 
> > >> 
> > >> When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
> > >> shading is completely black making the text unreadable:
> > >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading%2B2.png 
> > >> 
> > >> Can anyone suggest what we should look at?  We know it is not the printer
> > >> as
> > >> the AFP files actually look like this (screenshots taken using AFP
> > >> Viewer).
> > >> 
> > >> -- 
> > >> View this message in context:
> > >> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30842457.html
> > >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Jeremias Maerki
> > > 
> > > 
> > > -
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > -- 
> > View this message in context: 
> > http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30843028.html
> > Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.




Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

It is done via the API.  It is all automatic using a document management
system :)


mehdi houshmand wrote:
> 
> How are you invoking FOP? Programmatically (via the API) or via the
> command line? Once you know that, finding the file would be simple.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Mehdi

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844909.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread mehdi houshmand
How are you invoking FOP? Programmatically (via the API) or via the
command line? Once you know that, finding the file would be simple.

Thanks

Mehdi

On 4 February 2011 14:33, hirenshah  wrote:
>
> Erm... sorry I don't know where to find that.  I have just started looking at
> this issue and don't have a clue where all the files are.
>
> Jeremias Maerki-2 - I can't see it because I am using Nabble to see this
> mailing list.
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844861.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



RE: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

Erm... sorry I don't know where to find that.  I have just started looking at
this issue and don't have a clue where all the files are.

Jeremias Maerki-2 - I can't see it because I am using Nabble to see this
mailing list.
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844861.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread mehdi houshmand
Hi Hiren,

If you take a look at the fop website, it may answer a few of your
questions, here's a link to the quick start guide:

http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/quickstartguide.html

Mehdi

On 4 February 2011 14:29, Eric Douglas  wrote:
> No
> Your input file.
> That would be the file ending in .fo, or the .xml and .xsl.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: hirenshah [mailto:hiren.s...@rbs.co.uk]
> Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:22 AM
> To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Shading Issue
>
>
> The fop.xconf?
>
>
> Eric Douglas wrote:
>>
>> The xslfo file.  It's the intermediate file.  I was a bit confused
>> when I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
>> If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl
>
>> and xml files.
>> The fo file must exist to process FOP but it doesn't need to normally
>> be a physical file.  If you start with xml the fo may only be
>> generated in memory.
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844790.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



RE: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread Eric Douglas
No
Your input file.
That would be the file ending in .fo, or the .xml and .xsl.
 

-Original Message-
From: hirenshah [mailto:hiren.s...@rbs.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:22 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: RE: Shading Issue


The fop.xconf?


Eric Douglas wrote:
> 
> The xslfo file.  It's the intermediate file.  I was a bit confused 
> when I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
> If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl

> and xml files.
> The fo file must exist to process FOP but it doesn't need to normally 
> be a physical file.  If you start with xml the fo may only be 
> generated in memory.
> 

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844790.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
The one you see in my "From" header: d...@jeremias-maerki.ch

On 04.02.2011 13:52:12 hirenshah wrote:
> 
> The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file. 
> 
> What is your email address?  I will send you the AFP :)
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> > 
> > Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
> > and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
> > by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
> > In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
> > checked with Compart DocBridgeView, IBM Workbench, BTB Browser and ISIS
> > Papyrus AFP Viewer.
> > 
> > Which FOP version are you using? You can send me a sample AFP file
> > off-list and I'll check if I see anything wrong.
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844190.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 



Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



RE: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

The fop.xconf?


Eric Douglas wrote:
> 
> The xslfo file.  It's the intermediate file.  I was a bit confused when
> I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
> If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl
> and xml files.
> The fo file must exist to process FOP but it doesn't need to normally be
> a physical file.  If you start with xml the fo may only be generated in
> memory.
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844790.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



RE: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread Eric Douglas
The xslfo file.  It's the intermediate file.  I was a bit confused when
I first started working with FOP as I don't use the fo file.
If you don't have an fo file you could generate one or provide the xsl
and xml files.
The fo file must exist to process FOP but it doesn't need to normally be
a physical file.  If you start with xml the fo may only be generated in
memory.
 

-Original Message-
From: hirenshah [mailto:hiren.s...@rbs.co.uk] 
Sent: Friday, February 04, 2011 9:12 AM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Re: Shading Issue


What do you exactly mean by the FO?


mehdi houshmand wrote:
> 
> Hi Hirenshah,
> 
> If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll 
> take a look as well.
> 
> Mehdi

--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844681.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread mehdi houshmand
The FO is the standard input format used by FOP (FO Processor), if you
use XML and XSLT, could you convert the XML into FO with the XSLT and
post the resultant FO file.

Hopefully that makes sense.

Mehdi

On 4 February 2011 14:11, hirenshah  wrote:
>
> What do you exactly mean by the FO?
>
>
> mehdi houshmand wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hirenshah,
>>
>> If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll
>> take a look as well.
>>
>> Mehdi
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844681.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

What do you exactly mean by the FO?


mehdi houshmand wrote:
> 
> Hi Hirenshah,
> 
> If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll
> take a look as well.
> 
> Mehdi

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844681.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread mehdi houshmand
Hi Hirenshah,

If you could post the FO, cut out anything that's not pertinent, I'll
take a look as well.

Mehdi

On 4 February 2011 12:52, hirenshah  wrote:
>
> The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file.
>
> What is your email address?  I will send you the AFP :)
>
>
>
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
>>
>> Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
>> and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
>> by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
>> In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
>> checked with Compart DocBridgeView, IBM Workbench, BTB Browser and ISIS
>> Papyrus AFP Viewer.
>>
>> Which FOP version are you using? You can send me a sample AFP file
>> off-list and I'll check if I see anything wrong.
>>
>
> --
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844190.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>
>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

The print out looks the same as what I see in the AFP file. 

What is your email address?  I will send you the AFP :)



Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> 
> Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
> and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
> by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
> In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
> checked with Compart DocBridgeView, IBM Workbench, BTB Browser and ISIS
> Papyrus AFP Viewer.
> 
> Which FOP version are you using? You can send me a sample AFP file
> off-list and I'll check if I see anything wrong.
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30844190.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Hmm, I can't reproduce your problem. Mine was actually something else
and has to do with encoding monochrome images that have been generated
by JAI. Have you tried a different viewer or actually printed the file?
In my experience, there are huge differences between AFP viewers. I've
checked with Compart DocBridgeView, IBM Workbench, BTB Browser and ISIS
Papyrus AFP Viewer.

Which FOP version are you using? You can send me a sample AFP file
off-list and I'll check if I see anything wrong.

On 04.02.2011 11:25:21 hirenshah wrote:
> 
> Thanks!  Any help would be greatly appreciated :)
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> > 
> > I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
> > something on Wednesday.
> > 
> > On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
> >> 
> >> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the
> >> output
> >> looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png 
> >> 
> >> When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
> >> shading is completely black making the text unreadable:
> >> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading%2B2.png 
> >> 
> >> Can anyone suggest what we should look at?  We know it is not the printer
> >> as
> >> the AFP files actually look like this (screenshots taken using AFP
> >> Viewer).
> >> 
> >> -- 
> >> View this message in context:
> >> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30842457.html
> >> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > Jeremias Maerki
> > 
> > 
> > ---------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30843028.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org




Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

Thanks!  Any help would be greatly appreciated :)



Jeremias Maerki-2 wrote:
> 
> I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
> something on Wednesday.
> 
> On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
>> 
>> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the
>> output
>> looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png 
>> 
>> When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
>> shading is completely black making the text unreadable:
>> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading%2B2.png 
>> 
>> Can anyone suggest what we should look at?  We know it is not the printer
>> as
>> the AFP files actually look like this (screenshots taken using AFP
>> Viewer).
>> 
>> -- 
>> View this message in context:
>> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30842457.html
>> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> 
> 
> 
> Jeremias Maerki
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30843028.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Re: Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread Jeremias Maerki
I'll take a look. I've noticed something similar when when I was testing
something on Wednesday.

On 04.02.2011 09:06:50 hirenshah wrote:
> 
> We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the output
> looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png 
> 
> When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
> shading is completely black making the text unreadable:
> http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading%2B2.png 
> 
> Can anyone suggest what we should look at?  We know it is not the printer as
> the AFP files actually look like this (screenshots taken using AFP Viewer).
> 
> -- 
> View this message in context: 
> http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30842457.html
> Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.



Jeremias Maerki


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org



Shading Issue

2011-02-04 Thread hirenshah

We have an issue with table shading with AFP at the moment where the output
looks like this when shading is set to dithered:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading.png 

When we set shading to color it looks like this, but when printed the
shading is completely black making the text unreadable:
http://old.nabble.com/file/p30842457/Shading%2B2.png 

Can anyone suggest what we should look at?  We know it is not the printer as
the AFP files actually look like this (screenshots taken using AFP Viewer).

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Shading-Issue-tp30842457p30842457.html
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscr...@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-h...@xmlgraphics.apache.org