'
fo:table table-layout='fixed'
fo:table-column column-width='200px' /
fo:table-column column-width='100px' /
fo:table-body
fo:table-row height='100px'!-- this row will end up using 140px :(
--
fo:table-cell background-color='#00Bb84' padding='20px
I'm upgrading from FOP v0.20 to v1.0. My fixed sized tables are
coming out a different sized than before. I'm confused about why.
In the code below, I have a table-row with height=100px. The
table-cells have 20px of padding. I end up using 140px of height,
not
100px as I requested with
-master master-name=StandardPageMaster margin=0px
page-width=400px page-height=300px
fo:region-body margin=0px /
/fo:simple-page-master
/fo:layout-master-set
fo:page-sequence master-reference='StandardPageMaster'
fo:flow flow-name='xsl-region-body'
fo:table table-layout='fixed
Hello,
this is my first posting to the list, so please bear with me...
I've prepared a short .fo file that shows a table layout problem
(better: several table layout problems...) that I'm having.
I'm developing an application for a public transport organisation. One
of the parts involves
to the regularly scheduled program!
Christ van Willegen
On Nov 11, 2009, at 9:05 AM, Christ van Willegen wrote:
Hello,
this is my first posting to the list, so please bear with me...
I've prepared a short .fo file that shows a table layout problem
(better: several table layout problems...) that I'm
Hi folks,
I still can't understand what causes the following warning messages to
appear when I compile PDF docs using XSLTROC and FOP 0.94 in Debian Linux.
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
Apr 22, 2009 6:52:01 PM
Hi Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
Hi folks,
I still can't understand what causes the following warning messages to
appear when I compile PDF docs using XSLTROC and FOP 0.94 in Debian Linux.
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1
Hello Nancy,
nancy_b wrote:
For some reason, FOP complains about my tables:
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
Jul 24, 2007 1:47:14 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width
nancy_b wrote:
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
nancy_b nancy_brndt at yahoo.com writes:
snip
I need some customization that says:
if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
Hello nancy_b,
Did you
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/table-layout-warning-message-tf4135390.html#a1155
Sent from the FOP - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com
Last shot for today :-)
For some reason, FOP complains about my tables:
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified = falling back
to proportional-column-width(1)
Jul 24, 2007 1:47:14 PM org.apache.fop.fo.flow.TableColumn bind
WARNING: table-layout=fixed and column-width unspecified
Hi,
Since you are using the fixed table-layout FOP expects you to specify
the width of each column using the column-width property. Here FOP is
warning you that some columns have an unspecified width (or maybe they
are set to auto which essentially gives the same warning message),
therefore
you are using the fixed table-layout FOP expects you to specify
the width of each column using the column-width property. Here FOP is
warning you that some columns have an unspecified width (or maybe they
are set to auto which essentially gives the same warning message),
therefore it is dividing
/
/xsl:template
But it did not help. Please advise!
Thanks in advance,
Nancy
Patrick Paul wrote:
Hi,
Since you are using the fixed table-layout FOP expects you to specify
the width of each column using the column-width property. Here FOP is
warning you that some columns have
For some reason fop does not specify where in the text it found this problem,
so I don't have a snippet for that.
I need some customization that says:
if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
nancy_b wrote:
Last shot for today :-)
For some reason, FOP complains about my
.
HTH,
Patrick
nancy_b wrote:
For some reason fop does not specify where in the text it found this problem,
so I don't have a snippet for that.
I need some customization that says:
if table-layout=fixed, use proportional column width...
nancy_b wrote:
Last shot for today
On Jul 24, 2007, at 18:24, Patrick Paul wrote:
Minor correction to Patrick's response here:
Read the paragraph at
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.20.5/running.html#check-input
IIC, the right link to check is:
http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/0.93/running.html#check-input
On each fo:table element, of course. Yes, you indicated something about
a table-layout XSLT parameter you specify on the command-line, but we
don't see if you actually use this parameter in your stylesheet. The FO
snippet you showed us earlier had no indicator that you're actually
using the table
a
table-layout of auto.
Here is a fragment of the .FO file about which FOP complained. Further
down
the page is my invocation of FOP and some of the output I saw.
Around the reported error locus of line 88 and column 627 (!), I found
this
(excerpted and reformatted for humanitarian reasons
Bill Greene wrote:
I am puzzled as to why FOP seems to think that I have specified a
table-layout of auto.
That's because you didn't specify a table-layout property
on the table, therefore the default kicks in which happens
to be auto. You can ignore the warning, or specify
table-layout=fixed
-- Bill
J.Pietschmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 04/24/2006 04:47:57 PM:
Bill Greene wrote:
I am puzzled as to why FOP seems to think that I have specified a
table-layout of auto.
That's because you didn't specify a table-layout property
on the table, therefore the default kicks
Jason,
firstly you didn't say which version of FOP you are using.
Secondly, neither version of FOP supports HTML like automatic table layout
i.e. column width determination based on column content.
To achieve what you want you need to specify column widths and table
widths. In particular under
are using.
Secondly, neither version of FOP supports HTML like automatic table layout
i.e. column width determination based on column content.
To achieve what you want you need to specify column widths and table
widths. In particular under every fo:table element you should have a
fo:table-column width
I am using fop 0.91.
I am getting a warning that fo:table,
table-layout="auto" is currently not supported by FOP.
My table looks the way I want it to, but I wonder
what I should be doing to avoid that warning.
I have a multi-column table where the width of the
table is
On Feb 26, 2006, at 18:36, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Hi Tracey,
I am using fop 0.91.
I am getting a warning that fo:table, table-layout=auto is
currently not supported by FOP.
My table looks the way I want it to, but I wonder what I should be
doing to avoid that warning.
I have a multi
cells
What am I supposed to
do?
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas L Delmelle" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 1:30
PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
On Feb 26, 2006, at 18:36, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Hi Tracey, I am using f
On Monday 27 February 2006 02:59, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Excellent! That worked like a charm.
Another small question, if you or someone else has a moment.
I am using some spanned cells, but, at least for now, none of my
table cells have any borders.
I am getting a warning with a TODO
]
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 6:04 PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
On Monday 27 February 2006 02:59, Tracey Zellmann wrote:
Excellent! That worked like a charm.
Another small question, if you or someone else has a moment.
I am using some spanned cells
: Tracey Zellmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2006 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: table-layout
Thanks That worked perfectly as well.
Now that I seem to at least have FOP working, I want to make better use of
its facilities. How can I get a handle
I am getting an exception when trying to render pdf from my .fo
The error I am getting is:
Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
it seems to point to this table:
fo:table table-layout=fixed width=100%
fo:table-column
column-width
Your defining a table with three columns and your first row has 2 columns
(cells) and the second has 1. = invalid table layout.
- Start Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
I am
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 25, 2005 5:04 PM
To: fop-users@xmlgraphics.apache.org
Subject: Invalid table layout: cant fill gap at row 0, column 2
I am getting an exception when trying to render pdf from my .fo The error I am
Hello,
I have a question concerning FOP support of the
table-layout=auto. Does
FOP support this property?
I use FOP 0.20.5 to convert dynamically created xml file to
PDF. I don`t know in advance how much columns will be in the
xml table, and how wide columns will be. I use this property
33 matches
Mail list logo
