Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

Thanks @ohadlevy for making this happen. On Tue, Aug 9, 2016 at 9:29 AM, Tom McKay wrote: > The katello project will be moved under foreman as a sub-project next > week. If there are any concerns, please speak up before then. Thanks! > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:03 AM,

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

The katello project will be moved under foreman as a sub-project next week. If there are any concerns, please speak up before then. Thanks! On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:03 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > You do realize that every other plugin except Katello is under the > foreman >

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

> You do realize that every other plugin except Katello is under the foreman > project in redmine, correct? I haven't realized that, sorry for the noise :-) -- Later, Lukas #lzap Zapletal -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "foreman-dev" group. To

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

On 08/03/2016 06:30 PM, Tom McKay wrote: On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lukas Zapletal > wrote: > Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we combine? Because it's a plugin? And plugins have its own release cadence,

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

Lzap, You do realize that every other plugin except Katello is under the foreman project in redmine, correct? David On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we > combine? > > Because it's a

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 10:26 AM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: > > Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we > combine? > > Because it's a plugin? And plugins have its own release cadence, own > planning (Release versions, Target versions) and Categories. I

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:26 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote: >> Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we combine? > > Because it's a plugin? And plugins have its own release cadence, own > planning (Release versions, Target versions) and Categories. I don't see

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

> For example, several dev teams are experimenting with redmine "versions" > for their sprints[1]. I don't think that a single version can include One more thing. This will pollute Target versions, I don't like this. Can't we simply use Issue trackers for that? Redmine is quite good in creating

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

> Is there a case for keeping katello separate any longer, or can we combine? Because it's a plugin? And plugins have its own release cadence, own planning (Release versions, Target versions) and Categories. I don't see enough benefits of merging when I consider all the above. I don't know, I

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

+1 to less separation of the two projects in our overhead organization of issues/features. Andrew Kofink Software Engineering Intern Red Hat Satellite 6 akof...@redhat.com On Wed, Aug 3, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Marek Hulán wrote: > +1 for moving into Foreman project subtree > > --

Re: [foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

I think having everything under one tree makes sense. Long-term, the goal is to turn Katello to not feel like a separate project, but rather an extension. +1 Of course I'm not aware of some possible consequences if there are any? -- Ivan On Tue, Aug 2, 2016 at 3:56 PM, Tom McKay

[foreman-dev] Possible to move redmine Katello project under Foreman?

As we try to work towards better bugzilla and redmine component definitions and relations, I keep finding myself wishing I could use redmine for both foreman and katello issues together. For example, several dev teams are experimenting with redmine "versions" for their sprints[1]. I don't think