Re: [fossil-dev] Is fossil-dev still alive or is the forum preferred?

On Nov 20, 2018, at 5:43 AM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > It seems to me (based solely off of the docs, rather than understanding the > implementation) that that could be implemented much more simply: > > proc check-function-in-lib {function libs {otherlibs {}}} { >set _LIBS [get-define LIBS] >

Re: [fossil-dev] Is fossil-dev still alive or is the forum preferred?

On Nov 19, 2018, at 10:05 PM, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Is fossil-dev still the preferred place for dev-specific topics or is the > forum preferred for that? I’d use the forum. I don’t think there ever was enough traffic to justify two lists in the first place, for a project where its

Re: [fossil-dev] Is fossil-dev still alive or is the forum preferred?

On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 1:27 PM Richard Hipp wrote: > On 11/20/18, Stephan Beal wrote: > > Is fossil-dev still the preferred place for dev-specific topics or is the > > forum preferred for that? > > fossil-dev is still alive, but I think the forum is preferred. So, >

Re: [fossil-dev] Is fossil-dev still alive or is the forum preferred?

On 11/20/18, Stephan Beal wrote: > Is fossil-dev still the preferred place for dev-specific topics or is the > forum preferred for that? fossil-dev is still alive, but I think the forum is preferred. So, "yes" to both questions. -- D. Richard Hipp

[fossil-dev] Is fossil-dev still alive or is the forum preferred?

Is fossil-dev still the preferred place for dev-specific topics or is the forum preferred for that? -- - stephan beal https://wanderinghorse.net/home/stephan/ "Freedom is sloppy. But since tyranny's the only guaranteed byproduct of those who insist