Well, my understanding of rebase has changed since then, due to the
same problem we faced. Git 'forgets' unpublished versions when doing
rebase (but it need not - I may still be wrong here). I'm sure if
fossil implements rebase, it will not forget old versions.
What I'm interested in is the
This is a really nice theme, thanks for releasing it!
On 21 June 2010 16:12, zacht...@cis-partners.com wrote:
I have to say I'd love to see this skin incorporated, very nice work.
-Original Message-
From: Richard Hipp d...@sqlite.org
Sent: Monday, June 21, 2010 11:01am
To:
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 3:44 AM, altufa...@mail.com wrote:
I'm trying to build 953d293c32 version of fossil for Windows, which
seems broken:
gcc -g -O2 -o makeheaders .\\src\\makeheaders.c
awk { printf \#define MANIFEST_UUID \\\%%sn\, $1}
.\\src\\..\\manifest.uuid VERSION.h
gawk: {
Hi DRH,
I can build fossil from trunk now.
However, there seems some issue with date/time. It shows incorrect date:
$ rm test.fsl
$ ./fossil new test.fsl
project-id: 6e13be383106646451d79a5eae4f731c84d22135
server-id: f0202d8c43fc11569996c45150aca4740ffd49c6
admin-user: altufaltu (initial
4 matches
Mail list logo
