On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote:
For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might
be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main
difference for people watching the repo would be that they never need to
fossil pull because
Hello,
we had a bad merge, using the latest released fossil (2010-01-01). The merge was
removing files it should not remove. Hence I write to the list alerting on the
problem.
We tracked the problem, and attached proposed patches, in two tickets:
http://fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/c9d454153e
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:19 AM, Kohn Bernhard bernhard.k...@ait.ac.atwrote:
Hello,
I just send this email with an attachment (vs2010 solution), but it didn’t
shows up in the fossil-user mailforum.
How can I share the vs2010 solution?
Please send email directly to me.
Best regards
Hello again, with better news.
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 04:31:03PM +0100, Lluís Batlle i Rossell wrote:
Now we are experiencing a hang after saving the commit message. It's at 100%
of
cpu. We tried a -g -O0, and attaching gdb, but gdb is not any good at
resolving the call stack while in a
On Tue, 4 Jan 2011 11:03:29 -0800
Russ == Russ Paielli
russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote:
Russ I'd be interested to know if anyone is using fossil for a large
Russ software project. How large? Oh, let's say ten or more
Russ developers. If so, how is it working out?
Well, considering that Sqlite3 is
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Andreas Kupries andre...@activestate.comwrote:
So I got me the New Year's fossil download, and tried out the new
'test-integrity' command on some of my local repositories. One of them
reports
bf/dev fossil test-integrity
fossil: size mismatch
On 1/4/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote:
On 1/4/2011 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
sqlite.fossil _
fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unknown artifact
52afdedf4516cf772f3e99cec16635c1e2a2edcf
fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 3:36 PM, Andreas Kupries andre...@activestate.comwrote:
On 1/4/2011 12:31 PM, Andreas Kupries wrote:
On 1/4/2011 12:08 PM, Richard Hipp wrote:
sqlite.fossil _
fossil: cluster (rid=33544) references unknown artifact
On Jan 4, 2011, at 20:50 , Gour wrote:
Russ I'd be interested to know if anyone is using fossil for a large
Russ software project. How large? Oh, let's say ten or more
Russ developers. If so, how is it working out?
Well, considering that Sqlite3 is used as storage back-end, I believe
you
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 07:00:27PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Joerg Sonnenberger
jo...@britannica.bec.dewrote:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 06:38:54PM -0800, Russ Paielli wrote:
My organization currently uses Clearcase for a project with something
like 20
On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 9:38 PM, Russ Paielli russ.paie...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, let me rephrase my question. Is there any reason to believe that fossil
will not scale up well to a large project? I have very little experience
with SCM systems, and I'm just wondering if fossil was designed with
11 matches
Mail list logo
