Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread Eric
On Thu, February 9, 2012 7:47 am, Konstantin Khomoutov wrote: On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 01:55:01AM +0100, frantisek holop wrote: fossil always reports the latest artifact ID and commit message whenever doing 'fossil up', even though actually there was no new check-in. for example: $ fossil

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:19:36AM -, Eric said that fossil update is concerned only with the branch you have in your checkout directory. If autosync is on it does a pull first, but that's a separate operation, and it os concerned only with artifacts in the repository and knows

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread Martin Gagnon
Le 2012-02-09 à 05:04, frantisek holop min...@obiit.org a écrit : hmm, on Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 08:19:36AM -, Eric said that fossil update is concerned only with the branch you have in your checkout directory. If autosync is on it does a pull first, but that's a separate operation, and it

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 05:58:47AM -0500, Martin Gagnon said that i have never used git. i would simply prefer fossil to report nothing if there is nothing to report... $ fossil up $ come to think of it, as a developer i am not really interested in fossil's traffic

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread Konstantin Khomoutov
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:19:36 - Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: [...] $ fossil up Autosync: http://www.fossil-scm.org/ Bytes Cards Artifacts Deltas Sent: 177 2 0 0 Received:2608 57 0 0

Re: [fossil-users] _FOSSIL_ file grows large

2012-02-09 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Feb 8, 2012, at 17:05 , Richard Hipp wrote: I generally don't stress over a 10MB file on my 1TB disk drive, though... Still, it probably would not hurt to have Fossil do vacuum from time to time, would it? Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski

Re: [fossil-users] zip/tar patch

2012-02-09 Thread Remigiusz Modrzejewski
On Feb 7, 2012, at 23:11 , Stephan Beal wrote: Agreed completely - spaces in filenames are evil. (let the flame wars begin ;) Well, shouldn't a good filename start with - anyways? ;) Kind regards, Remigiusz Modrzejewski ___ fossil-users

Re: [fossil-users] zip/tar patch

2012-02-09 Thread Stephan Beal
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Remigiusz Modrzejewski l...@maxnet.org.plwrote: Well, shouldn't a good filename start with - anyways? ;) i once administered a Solaris system where someone accidentally managed, over a serial terminal, to touch a new file whos name was a single backspace

Re: [fossil-users] zip/tar patch

2012-02-09 Thread MIURA Masahiro
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:26, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i once administered a Solaris system where someone accidentally managed, over a serial terminal, to touch a new file whos name was a single backspace character (ASCII 0x08). The only way we managed to delete it was

Re: [fossil-users] zip/tar patch

2012-02-09 Thread frantisek holop
hmm, on Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:12:01AM +0900, MIURA Masahiro said that On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 02:26, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote: i once administered a Solaris system where someone accidentally managed, over a serial terminal, to touch a new file whos name was a single

Re: [fossil-users] make fossil up 'quiter'

2012-02-09 Thread Eric
On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 17:02:19 +0400, Konstantin Khomoutov flatw...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: On Thu, 9 Feb 2012 08:19:36 - Eric e...@deptj.eu wrote: snip fossil update is concerned only with the branch you have in your checkout directory. If autosync is on it does a pull first, but

[fossil-users] fossil commit failure after merge

2012-02-09 Thread Leo Razoumov
Hi List, I ran into a strange problem which results in fossil commit failure after a specific type of merge. I attached a self-contained shell script that reproduces the problem. Tested with trunk version of fossil on Linux. Here is the problem description. A fossil repository T.fossil contains

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit failure after merge

2012-02-09 Thread altufaltu
+1 I faced this a couple of days back and had to perform an incorrect commit. - Original Message - From: Leo Razoumov Sent: 02/10/12 03:39 AM To: Fossil SCM user's discussion Subject: [fossil-users] fossil commit failure after merge Hi List, I ran into a strange problem which

Re: [fossil-users] fossil commit failure after merge

2012-02-09 Thread Leo Razoumov
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 23:27, altufa...@mail.com wrote: +1 I faced this a couple of days back and had to perform an incorrect commit. Thanks for confirming my observations. I think this is a serious issue. I try to follow a policy of never committing to a public branch code that does not