2013/7/10 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
That well surpasses my understanding of how merging is tracked, so i'll just
be quiet now ;).
Well, merge-tracking is a part of fossil which I understand very
well. So I did just a little bit hacking:
Am 11.07.2013 11:07, schrieb Jan Nijtmans:
2013/7/10 Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com:
That well surpasses my understanding of how merging is tracked, so i'll just
be quiet now ;).
Well, merge-tracking is a part of fossil which I understand very
well. So I did just a little bit hacking:
On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:46:48PM -0400, Richard Hipp wrote:
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 10:51 PM, Joel Bruick [1]j...@joelface.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've committed a pretty big changeto the diff
code([2]http://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/info/4081a91c84) , and I'd
like
Hi,
I'm looking at using Fossil as a CM tool. Because of our systems I'm
looking at having a stand-alone Fossil repository with remote users who need
to have access to clones of the repository. This means the remote users
will be sent a copy of the clone and have to send their updates. Is
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Trachta, Nathan [USA]
trachta_nat...@bah.com wrote:
I’m looking at using Fossil as a CM tool. Because of our systems I’m
looking at having a stand-alone Fossil repository with remote users who
need to have access to clones of the repository. This means the
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:57 PM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:52 PM, Trachta, Nathan [USA]
trachta_nat...@bah.com wrote:
I’m looking at using Fossil as a CM tool. Because of our systems I’m
looking at having a stand-alone Fossil repository with remote
I have a Git fast-export that comes in at around 322MB in size or thereabouts.
I am running the Windows version of Fossil from 2013-06. I run the following
from within PowerShell and get some funny output:
C:\... git fast-export --all | fossil import --git blah.fossil
]ad fast-import line:
I should note that in the problem listed below, that this does not happen when
I use the Linux version.
--
Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us
From: Aaron W.Hsu
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 6:24 PM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
I have a Git
El 12/07/2013 00:28, Aaron W.Hsu arcf...@sacrideo.us escribió:
I have a Git fast-export that comes in at around 322MB in size or
thereabouts. I am running the Windows version of Fossil from 2013-06. I run
the following from within PowerShell and get some funny output:
C:\... git fast-export
El 11/07/2013 17:52, Trachta, Nathan [USA] trachta_nat...@bah.com
escribió:
Hi,
I’m looking at using Fossil as a CM tool. Because of our systems I’m
looking at having a stand-alone Fossil repository with remote users who
need to have access to clones of the repository. This means the
Thus said Rene on Thu, 11 Jul 2013 22:31:48 +0200:
I would prefer to not have that option. test-http is for testing a new
transport method. If you give someone read acces to your ssh repo then
test-http circumvents that. In fact test-htp makes you while connected
setup user
I agree with you
My vote is to go with the new behaviour only. More options usually means
more pain - albeit after getting though any transition troubles.
I am biased in this. The old method seemed brittle. However I haven't yet
tested your new code. Hopefully I'll get a chance to do that next week some
time.
12 matches
Mail list logo