On Wed, 15 Jan 2014, Joe Mistachkin wrote:
All the issues should be fixed now:
https://www.fossil-scm.org/index.html/vdiff?from=d0d7ca17a46a0832to=f61958b
183db741bsbs=1
Thank you! Also thanks for 'th1UnsetVar' work.
Sergei
___
fossil-users
I have `gpg' installed on my system. when doing `fsl branch new branchname
basis' (and only then) I'm prompted by `gpg' for my phassphrase. why is
this happening and how can I turn this off? am I missing something?
I'm quite sure that this passphrase query was not issued until some months
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:46:30 +0100
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I have `gpg' installed on my system. when doing `fsl branch new
branchname basis' (and only then) I'm prompted by `gpg' for my
phassphrase. why is this happening and how can I turn this off? am I
missing
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:03:34 +0100, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:46:30 +0100
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I have `gpg' installed on my system. when doing `fsl branch new
branchname basis' (and only then) I'm prompted by `gpg' for my
phassphrase. why
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:10:28 +0100
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I never have changed the default for this (off) and that's what
`fossil settings' tells me right now: `clearsign' is not explicitly
set one way or other. I am prompted for the gpg passphrase just the
same
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:21:20 +0100, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jan 2014 11:10:28 +0100
j. van den hoff veedeeh...@googlemail.com
wrote:
I never have changed the default for this (off) and that's what
`fossil settings' tells me right now: `clearsign' is not explicitly
set one way
So we have a branch-1.28 which is suppose to be for release. I'm
wondering if anybody is actually using and testing it?
Note that the self-hosting Fossil website, as well as most other websites I
control, like SQLite and Tcl/Tk, are running off of trunk and are thus
getting real-world testing of
Thus said Richard Hipp on Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:48:06 -0500:
So we have a branch-1.28 which is suppose to be for release. I'm
wondering if anybody is actually using and testing it?
I've been using it since it was branched, although my limited use cannot
come close to that of fossil-scm.org.
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:48:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
So we have a branch-1.28 which is suppose to be for release. I'm
wondering if anybody is actually using and testing it?
I am using it for some personal projects, but not 60K page views/day.
No problems here yet.
Cheers,
-Ben
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Ben Collver bencoll...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 10:48:06AM -0500, Richard Hipp wrote:
So we have a branch-1.28 which is suppose to be for release. I'm
wondering if anybody is actually using and testing it?
I am using it for some personal
Hello,
with one of the repos I experience slow commits:
7.54user 0.51system 0:17.16elapsed 46%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 24388maxresident)k
1186752inputs+1584outputs (0major+56950minor)pagefaults 0swaps
Here is some more info:
igour atmarama ~ financije trunk $ fossil dbstat
11 matches
Mail list logo
