Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

> Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads > On 2/20/17, Emil Totev wrote: >> Hi >> >> There are still inconsistencies in the binary downloads for linux at >> fossil's web site. >> >> File fossil-linux-x86-1.37.tar.gz contains a x64 (64-bit) executable. >> There

Re: [fossil-users] Longest gap between check-ins

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 20 Feb 2017 10:39:09 -0500: > Now remind me again, how would you do this in Git? ;-) To get these kinds of reports I import my Git repositories into Fossil. :-) Andy -- TAI64 timestamp: 400058ab1b40 ___

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

Thus said Richard Hipp on Mon, 20 Feb 2017 07:40:43 -0500: > I suspect that the Mac and OpenBSD builds are 64-bits too. I suppose > we could produce 32-bit binaries, but I worry that they would be > largely untested, since I use 64-bit machines almost exclusively, as I > suspect most of

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

Ah, I see it is somewhat quirky: https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/Compilation_and_Installation#W64 Thanks for explaining the Windows x64 gap. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 10:42 AM, Richard Hipp wrote: > On 2/20/17, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > > Any chance to

Re: [fossil-users] Longest gap between check-ins

On 20 February 2017 at 15:39, Richard Hipp wrote: > I don't know if the above has any practical use for most people (or I > would make it a new URI on the Fossil webserver) but it seems like fun > and so I thought I would share. sure!, it serves to document sleep patterns

Re: [fossil-users] fast-import crash (mark not declared)

On Fri, 17 Feb 2017 00:19:08 -0600 Artur Shepilko wrote: > To summarize the findings: > - Sqlite Fossil repo has a number of special cases that do not export > directly, resulting in "git fast-import" crash. > - To accomplish the export, one needs to apply the following

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

On 2/20/17, sky5w...@gmail.com wrote: > Any chance to get the Windows binary as x64 also? The problem with that (for me at least) is that it is difficult to compile the OpenSSL library using MSVC. OpenSSL really wants to be compiled with MinGW. And I only have a 32-bit

[fossil-users] Longest gap between check-ins

For a report, I wanted to know the longest interval between to check-ins (not necessarily on the same branch) for a project. In other words, I wanted to know the longest period of inactivity for a project. Turns out this is relatively easy to do with Fossil and some SQL. This message is just to

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

Any chance to get the Windows binary as x64 also? Thanks for Fossil. On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 9:58 AM, Roy Keene wrote: > I'd vote for x86_64 or amd64 (or even EM64T), but not "x64" (which is > gibberish). > > On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Richard Hipp wrote: > > On 2/20/17, Emil

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

I'd vote for x86_64 or amd64 (or even EM64T), but not "x64" (which is gibberish). On Mon, 20 Feb 2017, Richard Hipp wrote: On 2/20/17, Emil Totev wrote: Hi There are still inconsistencies in the binary downloads for linux at fossil's web site. File

Re: [fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

On 2/20/17, Emil Totev wrote: > Hi > > There are still inconsistencies in the binary downloads for linux at > fossil's web site. > > File fossil-linux-x86-1.37.tar.gz contains a x64 (64-bit) executable. > There seems to be no 32-bit linux executable download. > > Could

[fossil-users] Linux binary downloads

Hi There are still inconsistencies in the binary downloads for linux at fossil's web site. File fossil-linux-x86-1.37.tar.gz contains a x64 (64-bit) executable. There seems to be no 32-bit linux executable download. Could someone please fix that for this and future builds? Regards Emil

Re: [fossil-users] fossil-users Digest, Vol 109, Issue 26

On 19/02/2017 21:27, Ron W wrote: > > Currently there is no one in the Fossil community to run such a "chat > room". I know the existence of a ##fossil channel on freenode.net but maybe it's not official... :) ___ fossil-users mailing list