At Sat, 14 Mar 2015 13:33:31 -0700,
Andreas Kupries wrote:
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 8:46 PM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net wrote:
At Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:23:51 -0400,
James Moger wrote:
You have a great solution. If not then...
5. Corporate users/teams need hooks to integrate
At Fri, 13 Mar 2015 20:23:51 -0400,
James Moger wrote:
You have a great solution. If not then...
1. Corporate users/teams need client/server with a centralized/canonical
repo. Check.
2. Corporate users/teams need multiple-repositories. Check, although
configuration
At Sat, 30 Aug 2014 09:57:21 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
[1.2 text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 8:41 AM, Stephan Beal sgb...@googlemail.com wrote:
Out of curiosity's sake, i went ahead and
At Fri, 29 Aug 2014 08:33:13 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
[1.2 text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)]
On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:59 AM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net wrote:
There are some limitations that we worked
At Sat, 30 Aug 2014 06:46:28 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
[1.2 text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)]
On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:59 AM, Timothy Beyer bey...@fastmail.net wrote:
foo LIKE '%BAR%'
I believe
At Thu, 28 Aug 2014 11:42:58 -0400,
Todd Niec wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
[1.2 text/html; us-ascii (quoted-printable)]
Hi,
I am new to fossil as well as this list, so I apologize if this posting is
off-topic, answered
At Thu, 10 Jul 2014 17:54:49 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
i apologize if i gave that impression. i was refering to re-thinking in
terms of fixing, as
opposed to removing. i would not, in fact, mind if symlink support was dumped
(i have always
felt it falls outside of fossil's core, but i also
At Thu, 10 Jul 2014 09:52:13 -0700,
Matt Welland wrote:
[1 multipart/alternative (7bit)]
[1.1 text/plain; UTF-8 (7bit)]
[1.2 text/html; UTF-8 (quoted-printable)]
What is allow-symlinks set to for you? From context it sounds like it is set
to yes. If so this
is *terrible* behavior and
At Thu, 10 Jul 2014 20:10:09 -0700,
B Harder wrote:
It's clear people are split on what The Right Thing To Do is re: symliks.
I'm personally not sure; I don't use them in the course of development. That
said, I feel like
they should *not* be in indirrected-through as a matter of
At Thu, 10 Jul 2014 21:31:11 -0700,
B Harder wrote:
It's certainly not cut and dried :)
This has been a fairly thought provoking discussion, as in the process of
arguing for symlinks, I'm now questioning why I like them so much for backups
(I never use them for any of my development
At Wed, 09 Jul 2014 14:23:02 -0500,
Andy Goth wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In one project tree I have a symlink pointing to a directory outside
of the checkout directory. [fossil extras] lists all the files in the
referenced directory as extras even though they
At Thu, 28 Mar 2013 20:52:59 -0400,
James Turner wrote:
After a couple weeks of debate, I've decided to shut down Chiselapp.com.
As the message on the homepage states, new account and repository
creation has been disabled. Access to the website and repositories will
remain open until May 1st
At Sat, 10 Nov 2012 22:31:57 +0100,
j. van den hoff wrote:
thanks for responding.
I managed to solve my problem in the meantime (see my previous mail in
this thread), but I'll make a memo of sshfs and have a look at it.
joerg
Sshfs didn't fix the problems that I was having with
At Thu, 7 Jun 2012 12:11:00 +0200,
Stephan Beal wrote:
And i would go one step further and NOT use fossil for the system files.
Fossil does not support file permissions
other than the +x bit and does not understand user/group ownership. Without
that, using it for managing system-level
files
Dear List,
All of the remote ssh commands that I execute (pull/push/sync/clone) try to run
as the user nobody. This is a big problem, because I need to make sure that
other users on my machine cannot login to the web interface, (eg. I want
nobody and anonymous to have no capabilities) and I
At Mon, 7 May 2012 05:48:54 -0400,
Martin Gagnon wrote:
I'm using FreeBSD 9.0-RELEASE on both machines, with a snapshot from
2012-03-17. Should I use a newer snapshot?
Yes, this as been resolve recently. Now you have all capabilities via ssh,
since one which have ssh access can do
At Mon, 7 May 2012 05:48:54 -0400,
Martin Gagnon wrote:
Yes, this as been resolve recently. Now you have all capabilities via ssh,
since one which have ssh access can do whatever he want with the .fossil file.
--
Martin G.
I just tried the version from fossil (2012-05-05 13:53:37 UTC),
At Mon, 7 May 2012 06:51:19 -0400,
Martin Gagnon wrote:
Have you update server side as well?
Here is the output of fossil version on the server:
This is fossil version 1.22 [7fb59a67dc] 2012-05-05 13:53:37 UTC
Here is the output of fossil version on the client:
This is fossil version 1.22
18 matches
Mail list logo
