Re: [fossil-users] Repo extension in "fossil cgi" when used with "directory:"

2018-02-22 Thread Tino Lange
Hi Richard, ok, understood. I'll try to rename them. (Local checkouts on that machine itself need to point to the changed file then as well, so it might be more fallout than renaming) Thanks for looking at that! As I had a quick (non-deep) look I thought it is only a matter of making a static

Re: [fossil-users] Repo extension in "fossil cgi" when used with "directory:"

2018-02-21 Thread Tino Lange
- just making the file extension to search for configurable. Thanks and best regards Tino -- Am Tue, 30 Jan 2018 15:22:54 + schrieb Tino Lange: > Hi! > > One wish for >= 2.5: > > Could you please make the extension of repositories configurabl

[fossil-users] Repo extension in "fossil cgi" when used with "directory:"

2018-01-30 Thread Tino Lange
Hi! One wish for >= 2.5: Could you please make the extension of repositories configurable in "fossil cgi", when used with "directory:"? Background: I have been using the recipe: https://www.fossil-scm.org/xfer/ wiki?name=Cookbook#CGI (see section "Another solution to automatically serve

[fossil-users] fossil rm --hard dir1

2017-12-13 Thread Tino Lange
Hi! When doing a $ fossil rm --hard dir1 it will unregister from fossil and then delete all files within the 'dir1' hierarchy. But: The directory/directories will keep existing! I need to do a $ rm -rf dir1 afterwards (so the whole --hard is mostly needless, since I need to do the

Re: [fossil-users] fossil all remove?

2016-02-19 Thread Tino Lange
> Should be automatic. When you do "fossil all ls -c", Fossil checks that > each of the check-out directories exists, and removes any that do not > exist from the list. Thanks. The directory still exists (but with some other content now, especially it has no .fslckout file) So I'll move it

[fossil-users] fossil all remove?

2016-02-19 Thread Tino Lange
Hi Fossilers, There is no "fossil all remove". How can I get rid of an entry in "fossil all ls -c" for which the checkout does not exist anymore? Do I need to fiddle with SQL? Thanks Tino ___ fossil-users mailing list

Re: [fossil-users] Using fossil just for the wiki. Images and tables?

2016-01-26 Thread Tino Lange
>> [...] Fossil's Markdown support is via libdiscount [...] > [...] Oh, Fossil uses Discount. Thanks, [...] libdiscount? Sure? Isn't that a special version of libsoldout? ___ fossil-users mailing list fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org

Re: [fossil-users] click-to-diff on IE8

2012-12-07 Thread Tino Lange
Richard Hipp wrote on Fri, 07 Dec 2012 09:38:27 -0500: I do not have access IE8. The oldest windows box I have is running IE9. Hi! ( I know the concrete problem is already fixed. But for the next time ) maybe this link here is helpful:

[fossil-users] 1.22: Add the ability to run TH1 scripts after sync requests

2012-05-24 Thread Tino Lange
Hi! 1.22 ChangeLog: Add the ability to run TH1 scripts after sync requests I'm a bit lost -- where can I find more infrmation about that new feature? Examples? What to do with it? Can I for example use it to have some basic commit hooks? Thanks Tino

[fossil-users] Release version of fossil based on embedded SQLite with alpha status?

2011-09-05 Thread Tino Lange
It's been a long time since there has been an official release of Fossil. This is Version 1.19. Changes in this release include: [...] - Update to the latest SQLite version 3.7.8 alpha. Hi! An official release with an embedded *alpha* version? Is this really a release version meant

[fossil-users] Keyword Expansion?

2010-12-03 Thread Tino Lange
Hi List, would it be possible to add a feature like the good old keyword expansion from SVN (in fact even from CVS) to fossil? For scripts there's no possibility to embedd the version or any kind of additional information at the moment. Yes, there is (maybe nowadays...) the manifest and the

Re: [fossil-users] Keyword Expansion?

2010-12-03 Thread Tino Lange
Hi Paul, thanks very much for your quick response. fossil and sqlite solve that somehow by being compiled :-) -- they just compile the information from those manifest files in their final executable, but thats not a reasonable approach for scripts that are executed by an interpreter.

[fossil-users] fossil and file permissions -- was: Re: Fossil limitation workarounds

2009-12-02 Thread Tino Lange
Barry Kauler wrote: 4. Fossil does not record permissions and ownerships of files. Tino Lange wrote: Is that true? A quick experiment with a 755 and 644 file, checked in in my working repository, synced to the master repository and checked out at another location from the master showed