ubject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil HTTPS Support
If it gets added to trunk, could the binding to libcrypto and libopenssl please
be optional? I mean rather than compiling with a dependency on those libs, add
code to dynamically load these libraries and disable https: support if they
cannot be foun
:12 AM
To: fossil-users@lists.fossil-scm.org
Subject: Re: [fossil-users] Fossil HTTPS Support
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 08:09:21 George King wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Given the recent security discussion, I would like to inquire about the
> current state of HTTPS support Unless t
On Tuesday 12 January 2010 08:09:21 George King wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Given the recent security discussion, I would like to inquire about the
> current state of HTTPS support Unless there are
> compelling reasons not to, could these additions be merged into trunk?
I would also like this. No n
Hi list,
Given the recent security discussion, I would like to inquire about the current
state of HTTPS support. I played with the SSL branch, which I read about a
couple weeks ago. My experiments with it were successful, and I am considering
switching my repositories to use the protocol. Unle
4 matches
Mail list logo
