On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:48:15AM +0100, Remigiusz Modrzejewski spake:
>
> On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote:
>
> > For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might
> > be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main
> > difference f
On Jan 3, 2011, at 20:19 , Stephan Beal wrote:
> For a small project with 1-2 devs who work in different timezones, it might
> be reasonable. And read-only access should never be a problem. The main
> difference for people "watching" the repo would be that they never need to
> "fossil pull" becau
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Michael Barrow wrote:
> This doesn't sound like a good idea at all. Yes the sync is pretty quick
> under normal circumstances, but that could easily go awry. Who would fix the
> two copies of the repo when there is a simultaneous commit by two parties?
That's wha
This doesn't sound like a good idea at all. Yes the sync is pretty quick
under normal circumstances, but that could easily go awry. Who would fix the
two copies of the repo when there is a simultaneous commit by two parties?
On Mon, Jan 3, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Stephan Beal wrote:
> Hello, fossilers
Hello, fossilers!
Some of my fossil repos are not on the web, but instead in my DropBox (a
file backup/sync service: http://getdropbox.com). i'm wondering if another
Dropbox user out there has tried sharing a fossil repo with other developers
via dropbox-shared folders. If so, were there any notab
5 matches
Mail list logo